Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (127963)	1/9/2017 6:13:31 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	1 Recommendation Recommended By bart13 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 220367

Coal really doesn't make sense... It's simple. For power gen... Then again wind, solar etc are all being put under centralised stewardship.. Better to have more distributed systems... but how can the government tax that :))

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (127963)	1/10/2017 2:54:28 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 220367

Elroy, you must have trouble reading for comprehension. Where did you get that weird idea? << But it's nothing more than an attempt to impose a very costly fuel on industries which long ago began the conversion to natural gas due to its significantly lower costs. You've merely succumbed to Trump group-think. >> Presumably you just make stuff up. I'm not in favour of coal over gas or wind or waves or photovoltaic or cellulose or insulation or electric cars or diesel or petrol. It's just a matter of technology and economics which is better for a particular time and place. If methane is cheaper than coal then people will use that. If it isn't, they won't. How did Big Don get into the act and why do you think I have some preference for one or the other? Mqurice