To: neolib who wrote (5420 ) 1/9/2017 4:16:39 PM From: one_less Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 354736 >>>You are clearly trying to claim that urban areas are more of "one mind" and rural areas are more diverse.<<< To which I respond: BS. Not true. >>>To which I respond: BS.<<< Yep. I've tried my best to help you but the BS is of your own making, and you insist on it so, not much I can do. >>>And now you are trying to claim you never made such a claim. Why not read what you write?<<< I never made the claim you are fussing about. I am trying my best to clear that up for you but feel free to keep wringing your hands over your own nonsense. I was not agreeing to your complaint wrt urban and rural. I used the word broad sectors not rural. I never used the word rural and I told you specifically I was not considering your polarized view of Metro vs rural. If you can't think of people outside those two demographics then I can see your confusion. You insisted on the acreage term which was just well, your term. I pointed that out as a mistake. I said there is a broad range of sectors with a wide range of lifestyle and interests. I told you not to think of that as just two polarizing groups but you continue to argue that straw man anyway. Sectors man sectors. Public and Private, industrial, transportation, communication, farming, mining, ranching, business, finance, inner city, suburbia, regionally diverse sections of the country etc. etc. etc. I referred to major inner city urban areas as being of one mind politically, not one demographic. Of course the inner city people are diverse in every other way. I showed you a map, demonstrating how blue clusters on inner city a lot to support the premise that these areas are of one mind for the most part. You are off arguing with a silly straw man of your own creation. I have no part in that.