Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (5435)	1/9/2017 5:15:22 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 353744

Cities have far more diversity in economics, races, religions, sexual preference and in every other measure of diversity. It's undeniable. If you want to escape all that scary diversity, you go live in the boonies somewhere.

To: neolib who wrote (5435)	1/9/2017 5:21:38 PM
From: one_less	Respond to of 353744

>>>Even if it was the original premise, as I've pointed out, you've provided absolutely nothing to support your contention that the red sections of the map have more diversity in "sectors" than the blue sections. You just make crap up. <<< I never made any such claim. This is just you making crap up that you think I've argued with you about. didn't Ok. At least we have a starting point. The original premise..."one sector (inner city) of the country making rules for the rest." I also provided several posts to clear up the mistaken assumption on your part that I was comparing rural areas to cities. Remember the post where I clarified what is meant by "broader sectors"? Oh btw this is what a quote looks like: "Sectors man sectors. Public and Private, industrial, transportation, communication, farming, mining, ranching, business, finance, inner city, suburbia, regionally diverse sections of the country etc. etc. etc. I referred to major inner city urban areas as being of one mind politically, not one demographic. Of course the inner city people are diverse in every other way." In another post the map was to draw your attention to major inner city homogeneity wrt politics, which you had denied, for a reason I can't explain. Anything else you want to take from that map is fine with me but it is yours (like this rural thing you keep ranting about) not mine. >>>Cities have far more diversity in economics than the rural areas, so again, you are just out to lunch making up wild assed claims with no substantiation.<<< This is you again ... its kind of odd how you do keep doing that. I never made any claims about diversity in economics. I consider it a separate topic of which I know practically nothing. Feel free to continue your argument but the best I can do is tell you I don't know much about it.