To: Frank Byers who wrote (551 ) 1/5/1998 8:30:00 PM From: John J. Thrall Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1394
Thanks again for the post that seems to have started all this capacity discussion,dbsdish.com Lets assume that the majority of users will only have one fixed dish. Then according to the chart, DBS (Direct TV/USSB) has 50% more bandwith then Echostar. I'm not sure how this translates, but if the two are using roughly the same decoding technology then that translates to 50% more channels. A few questions to all on the thread: 1. Where are these sports channels going to go? Right now my system has HTS activated and 2 Fox alternate stations + 2 ESPN alternate stations. 2. If they had additional channel capability, why aren't they using it for PPV movies. Right now they only offer 8 or 9 at a time, vs. DBS's advertised 50+ a night! PPV movies seem like an obvious revenue source, and I for one would probably buy more if there was a better selection. 3. Does anyone know anything about TEMPO. The table lists them as having the other 11 frequency licenses at 119 degrees, the location of Echostar I and II. In the near term DISH looks to take flight as more in the investment community find out about subscriber growth and the local TV situation (still very low volume). And in the long term I'm sure DISH has a plan for implementing increased channel capacity (software upgrades, etc.) I'd just like to know what the plan is. I'll hang out over at the DBS thread for a while nd find out the differences in package offerings. Also, maybe we can ask "Charlie" about future plans on the next Charliechat. But this two dish or movable dish business is for the birds. Thanks again for your informative posts, John