Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : JAB International (JABI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DDS-OMS who wrote (2495)	1/5/1998 4:31:00 AM
From: James Bender	Respond to of 4571

Gary thanks for your time....I would have attempted to do as you have but because of a lack of time and my ability to methodically think out the answers for those questions while fuming, I felt someone else would do a better job of it....As you have ....Jim

To: DDS-OMS who wrote (2495)	1/5/1998 4:44:00 AM
From: Ryan Weisman	Respond to of 4571

Gary, thank you so much! Now I'm learning!!! EOM

To: DDS-OMS who wrote (2495)	1/5/1998 5:06:00 AM
From: Oscar	Respond to of 4571

Gary, thanks for your solid work. One does get weary of seeing the same old flags run up the flagpole time after time, eh? Especially when the same guy is doing the running, just trying out a different handle for the exercise. Ryan, I also just returned from a wonderful off-line vacation and found it mildly irksome to wade through dozens of off-topic posts one after another, but I suppose (1) it's related to it having been the 'tween-holidays week when real substance was extremely thin; and (2) there ought to be some penalty for taking a vacation (God knows there is at my day job!). Happy New Year to all. (Hype: A happy new year is likely!) Oscar

To: DDS-OMS who wrote (2495)	1/5/1998 9:40:00 AM
From: Brian Pastor	Respond to of 4571

Gary, as ususal an excellent FACTUAL post. Thanks for your informative responses.

To: DDS-OMS who wrote (2495)	1/5/1998 10:12:00 AM
From: Martin Wormser	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4571

Gary, WOW! What an execellent post. I can't believe you wasted 3 1\2 hours or your time refuting Goldidiot. He's not worth 1 minute of your time. He only posts to stir up trouble. martin

To: DDS-OMS who wrote (2495)	1/5/1998 11:23:00 AM
From: Dundee Maples	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4571

Gary, you are a better man than I. Great post, I wish I had your patience and wish I could say that your post would end the onslaught of these rather silly questions. Looking forward to the meeting on thursday. Does anyone want to get together the night before to discuss questions etc. that we may want to ask? For those that aren't attending, I suggest that you post or e-mail questions that you wish answered by the management. Please, make them serious (no "but the guy is Canadian..." type questions).

To: DDS-OMS who wrote (2495)	1/5/1998 10:56:00 PM
From: Lord Smooth	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4571

I sold my stake in BCMD about a month ago to go after another stock. I am currently looking to get back into BCMD. Not having a stake in company over the past few weeks, I've hopefully have become more objective. Gary and others, perhaps you could give me your take some nagging issues I have. If the JV puts up the additional money in February, it also gets an additonal 4 million warrants at around $0.33 (figure correct?). That brings total potential warrants given to Sterling to 10 million warrants at around $0.33. The way I see it is that the common shareholders are taking all the risk while the JV has some of assurance of regaining the roughly $14 million or whatever it plans to payout over the next 30 months. The question I am asking myself is, why do I want to own this stock at $1.00 when the JV is essentially valuing it at $0.33? I know there is great potential for discovery of gold. But then again, if such great potential, a $14 million (?) investment over 2.5 years seems like a good risk / reward in of itself, without warrants. To a lesser extent I am curious about the length of time it is taking to assay the material mined. Hopefully the delay is because they want a comprehensive report of the ore they have mined. Third, also to a lesser extent, what was the Wolf Creek Vein? Flipping through press releases several years ago, there seemed to be much BCMD potential surrounding a mine called Wolf Creek? Whatever happened to that mine? Thanks for your input, if you have the time/inclination. Regards, Schopenhauer