Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Zenyatta Free Speech Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: NuclearCrystals who wrote (14417)	1/13/2017 10:54:41 AM
From: Heres30	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22811

Seems reality is setting in for the sheep, and poor little Brucey wants no part of it, so he's stomping his feet!

To: NuclearCrystals who wrote (14417)	1/13/2017 11:02:06 AM
From: the Chief	Respond to of 22811

Why are you assuming its TCCers? You got any info to support that accusation? I sure don't You explain its a part of life prior to pre construction and so normal, then blame us as if you are whining?

To: NuclearCrystals who wrote (14417)	1/13/2017 11:36:03 AM
From: NLWest	Respond to of 22811

Oh dear, someone is feeling like yesterday's abandoned play toy. Traders become traitors?

To: NuclearCrystals who wrote (14417)	1/13/2017 11:36:14 AM
From: the Chief	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22811

Strange NC, I just read the entire CCB forum and there is nothing negative there. Post the link to the "dissapointing posts in the CCB forum please"

To: NuclearCrystals who wrote (14417)	1/16/2017 10:29:03 AM
From: NLWest	1 Recommendation Recommended By Heres30 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22811

"Message to specific TradingChief members .............. as I read the TradingChief forums I find myself shaking my head at your ridiculous commentary on CCB and its share price. The Miller Project is at a stage of development that very few juniors get to, never mind through and the only thing your selling is doing, is lowering any potential terms for funding the Miller project into production." _______________________________________________________________________________________ I don't think they got the message, lol. Or, maybe they want in on the pp but @ $0.10 so they have a reasonable chance of making another trade or two before departing for greener pastures.

To: NuclearCrystals who wrote (14417)	1/25/2017 10:33:39 AM
From: NLWest	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22811

NC, a couple of weeks ago you posted the following message. I am curious why CCB needs funding to get "...the Miller project into production...." when a lot your posts in the past were talking about how funding was not needed because the marble contract was going to provide a revenue stream that would facilitate the extraction and processing of 1500 tons (or thereabouts) per year of graphite. Has something changed that means that CCB now needs funding? _________________________________________________________________________________ Message #14417 from NuclearCrystals at 1/13/2017 10:05:05 AM Message to specific TradingChief members .............. as I read the TradingChief forums I find myself shaking my head at your ridiculous commentary on CCB and its share price. The Miller Project is at a stage of development that very few juniors get to, never mind through and the only thing your selling is doing, is lowering any potential terms for funding the Miller project into production. Yes .......... you are killing your own interest and that of every other CCB investor. If you're that discouraged ........ it has to be because you truly are short term traders. If so, it illustrates that much of the criticism levelled at you by Zennanites is accurate. Never have I seen a such group of whining investors that are hell bent on damaging their own interest by selling the issuer down ........... short term traders do that kind of thing when things don't go on their timeline. The Miller Project is so close to production and you whiners appear to want to distance that mine commissioning.