Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: POKERSAM who wrote (993720)

1/13/2017 3:52:53 PM

From: koan

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575171

Nothing in your post is true.

Do you believe NASA??

"Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

<<

There is massive difference between faith or belief in AGW and climate science. There is no climate science to support AGW. Therefore AGW must be accepted by faith alone.
If you want to deny climate science and accept by faith that AGW exist, that is fine. There are thousands who do.
Many who believe in AGW claim to believe in it as a result of climate science. But of course that is not so. As a matter of fact many scientist say that is ridiculous. The mere fact that so many climate scientists reject AGW is evidence that AGW is not supported by climate science. It is only supported by faith.
You claimed 97% of scientist believe in AGW for a good while. That was debunked as untrue.
Now you say a majority of top scientist believe in AGW.
Next it will be lots of top scientist believe in AGW.
Then it will be some scientist still believe in AGW.
Then it will be that there are a few who still believe in AGW.
Finally you will be saying a couple of us here on Si still believe in AGW. ROFLMHO
No one can deny that is the trend. The trend is fewer and fewer of those who claim to be scientist say they believe AGW exist. The scientific evidence is just not there.
I do not claim to be a climate scientist but I do claim to have some common sense.

There is no evidence that AGW exist presented by any claiming to be scientist that has not been debunked by others claiming to be scientist. Thus a belief in AGW must be the result of faith and not an application of climate science. The believer group says it is settled science and the nonbelievers say that is nonsense.
The burden of proof rests with the believers.
When you can prove it by science come talk to me. Until then you are just an AGW nutjob believer.