Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Zenyatta Free Speech Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: the Chief who wrote (14463)	1/15/2017 12:15:18 PM
From: RuddyMongoose	1 Recommendation Recommended By muskavite Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22811

Message #14463 from the Chief at 1/14/2017 12:12:40 PM Maybe people just don't believe that CCB will reach the price predictions you posted so they locked-in smaller but sure profits and moved their money to other companies with more profit potential? They de-risked their investment and that is not such a bad thing when CCB success is not guaranteed. 1) Do you see guaranteed success in ZEN? 2) What part of the $13KUS indicative pricing letter do you not trust? 3) What part of the $13.75million Marble contract do you not trust? Before you answer, let me quote Muskies hyper intelligence Zenyatta is under multi NDAs and can't disclose that without legal action or approval. Message 30933156 So it appears ZEN owners are willing to accept that ZEN cannot disclose things becaise of NDAs and if they did it would create Legal Action. Do you believe that ZEN is the only company to endure such things? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Chief, if you want to discuss something Musky posted, you should address your comments to him not to me. 1) Do you see guaranteed success in ZEN? Of course not. 2) What part of the $13KUS indicative pricing letter do you not trust? I don't trust any of it after CCB was forced to withdraw reference to it in their NR. 3) What part of the $13.75million Marble contract do you not trust? I don't trust any of it until/if CCB releases the name of the company who signed that contract CCB disclosed in an NR. Your statement that the company signed a NDA so their identity can't be disclosed is a specious argument. Given that circumstance, CCB should not have signed a contract and then issued an NR about it because that is material information that could affect CCB's price but the secrecy makes vetting by investors impossible. The fact that you don't see an issue there is astounding to me but I understand your position because you are a trader and you will say anything to help your trade. Don't misunderstand me here. I am not criticizing you for wanting to trade CCB. I'd want to trade it too if I owned it and I'd also say just about anything to improve CCB's price and help my trade.