Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Zenyatta Free Speech Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Shoto who wrote (14475)	1/15/2017 2:13:10 PM
From: RuddyMongoose	1 Recommendation Recommended By muskavite Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 22811

Shoto, stop ignoring the facts. Re-hashing all your old discredited comments will not change reality. Your resistance to acknowledging the facts is futile. The inconvenient facts that are making life difficult for the ZEN bashers: The ZEN bashers just can't handle the truth and it's causing them to become mentally unstable. The only cure is to stop thinking about ZEN but they can't do it so they continue to suffer the their own unique version of investor selfie-punishment. "Its nice to be a Zenyatta shareholder. 1) Zenyatta shareholders don't fight with each other. 2) Zenyatta shareholders are not attempting to liquidate their positions. 3) Zenyatta shareholders don't have to worry that Zen's news releases will be recalled. 4) Zenyatta shareholders do not have a CEO who is an embarrassment. 5) Zenyatta shareholders know their CEO is concerned with one company and only one company. 6) Zenyatta shareholders know that Zenyatta graphite has been endorsed by multiple corporations. 7) Zenyatta shareholders know that Zenyatta graphite has been endorsed by multiple Universities. 8) Zenyatta shareholders know that Zenyatta graphite has been endorsed by multiple research facilities. 9) Zenyatta shareholders know that the Province of Ontario has endorsed Zenyatta graphite by facilitating grants to the company. 10) Zenyatta shareholders know that the Canadian government has endorsed Zenyatta graphite by facilitating federal grants to Zenyatta. 11) Zenyatta shareholders know that the Federal government is providing federal grants to the town of Hearst to get ready for a graphite mine development close to the town of Hearst. 12) (Which graphite mine might that be??) Credit to: Message 30934653

To: Shoto who wrote (14475)	1/16/2017 5:18:32 PM
From: LearntoTrade	2 Recommendations Recommended By Gilmar1 klondikekid Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 22811

Interesting you highlight confidence level for FS. So, is it possible CCB has new pricing info but can't release it until FS is public? After all, the world almost stopped because they released the $13K figure prior to the PEA. BTW, the park is nowhere near the pit zones. Also worthy of consideration is to realize the miniscule area that is to be the pits. And if this expands out, as it could if part of a much larger system, do you think the 'park' will trump the feds? There is a pulse on this stock but it is a waiting game, until it is not. Everyone chooses their risk/ reward.

To: Shoto who wrote (14475)	1/27/2017 2:33:19 PM
From: RuddyMongoose	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 22811

Message #14475 from Shoto at 1/15/2017 1:16:35 PM Good for you Ruddy - good thinking. "I don't trust any of it until/if CCB releases the name...." And if it doesn't exist no marble extraction will be in the PFS, or the FS because the accountants and engineers in Tetra Tech would need to see that to do their calculations. The margin for error for economics is much tighter than each step before. They put their careers, standing with their peers and the company on the line. ....And you might want to think about that need for credible verifiable quotes if you are in any other stock trying to advance past a PEA. A PFS might squeak thru with basic market quotes from independent firms (?)...A full FS, not so much. They need real facts. And you might want to understand that these studies don't result in a guarantee of success or dramatic catastrophic failures. They either move ahead methodically or just slowly and quietly die on the vine as delays and special studies are carried on...and on...and on. Re-hashing metallurgy and sending more samples to whoever needs free publicity. Good stuff Ruddy. ------------------------------------------------------------ So Shoto, do you feel that the report released today is moving ahead methodically? The report appears to be another PEA. Was the first one not acceptable to CIM or OSC or some other governing entity?