Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (994331)	1/16/2017 4:08:03 PM
From: Taro	1 Recommendation Recommended By Mick Mørmøny Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571611

I don't think life accompanied the Big Bang but rather developed millions of years later. From what? Even assuming, that a lot of molecules of all kinds were around, how did life develop itself next? So far nobody has been able to duplicate that process - not even Dr. Frankenstein, except for in the shape of Boris Karloff, that is. So much has been tried and so many have been working on it to get some kind of life stepping out of the dead molecule soup. But all in vain! How come, some God elixir missing, The Stone of Wisdom, or what? Whatever you believe in, intelligent design or life just popping up from nothing like that, ANY of that requires truly believing in something. Call it whatever you want. All of it way beyond our imagination and time-line - is there one, time-line I mean? Did time ever start - or maybe there is no beginning of time, or life, or... the Big Bang, where did that come from? From nothing, from nothing before that? Must have come from something, right? Don't even try to be clever in this department, only makes you looking stupid. This is all stuff way over our head, way over our imagination as little creeps with but a swift guest presence on this Earth, in this Universe. /Taro