SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (128536)1/18/2017 12:18:47 PM
From: Pogeu Mahone1 Recommendation

Recommended By
marcher

  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 218167
 
The USA cannot clean it's own house!

I do not want to pay to clean up their degradation that they did by choice.

Let them suffer the consequences. We suffer the consequences of our
toxic crimes and mistakes and do not have the political will nor resources to clean it up.

This list could go on forever:O(

No clean water as in Flint Michigan

The toxic spew in The Rocky Mountains from abandon mines:



Watershed Contamination from Metal and Uranium Mining Photo Gallery

https://toxics.usgs.gov/photo_gallery/aml_all.html

Nov 15, 2016 - Pennsylvania Mine in the headwaters of Peru Creek, Colorado. ... Toxic metals (such as copper in excess) bind to the particles, which are then .... Mineral Creek receives acid mine drainage from abandoned mine lands and is ...

Abandoned Mine Leaks Millions Of Gallons Of Bright Orange, Toxic ...

thinkprogress.orgabandoned-mine-leaks-millions-of-gallons-of-bright-orange-...

Aug 10, 2015 - Three million gallons of bright orange wastewater has spilled from an abandoned mine inColorado, after Environmental Protection Agency ...

Contaminating the Rockies | Science, Health and Physical Education ...

www.pbslearningmedia.org/resource/envh10...toxicmines/contaminating-the-rockies/

Learn how abandoned mines have been contaminating water supplies in the Rocky Mountains in this video from NOVA: Poison in the Rockies. ... In small quantities, some metals are essential to life, but in larger quantities they are toxic.

=================================

Superfund Sites.

The NPL guides the EPA in "determining which sites warrant further investigation" for environmental remediation. As of February 27, 2014, there were 1322Superfund sites on the National Priorities List in the United States. Fifty-three additional sites have been proposed for entry on the list.

List of Superfund sites - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.orgSuperfund_sites

Feedback

About this result

List of Superfund sites - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.orgSuperfund_sites

The NPL guides the EPA in "determining which sites warrant further investigation" for environmental remediation. As of February 27, 2014, there were 1322 Superfund sites on the National Priorities List in the United States. Fifty-three additional sites have been proposed for entry on the list.
? List of Superfund sites in New ... · ? Superfund sites in California · ? New Jersey · ? Texas

Search for Superfund Sites Where You Live | Superfund | US EPA

epa.govsuperfund/search-superfund-sites-where-you-live

United States Environmental Protection Agency ... Advanced search: for NPL and non-NPL Superfund sites (advanced queries) · Cleanups in my Community ..

People also ask

What is a Superfund site?

What is the purpose of cercla?

What is the national priority list?

Who pays for the cleanup of toxic sites on the Superfund National Priorities List?

Superfund | US EPA

epa.govsuperfund

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) site about the CERCLA statute and Superfund programs.

Superfund Sites: America's Most Contaminated Places | TakePart

www.takepart.com/photos/worst-superfund-sites

Feb 22, 2013 - Contaminated and hazardous, American's worst Superfund Sites are where pollution goes to die.



To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (128536)1/18/2017 1:12:00 PM
From: louel1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Haim R. Branisteanu

  Respond to of 218167
 
Yes population control is also of up-most importance.

Population control is the only thing which will have a sustainable affect which can be humanly managed. The world can only support so many before it is over taxed.

With the immense expansion of the population there would be no effect on climate. The use of coal, oil and fossil fuels contribute to greenhouse gasses. We can accept that as fact. To the tunnel visioned it is all they see.
But continually clearing more areas of natural vegetation and forests around the World for farmland to house the ever growing masses and beef or meat production is just as bad or worse. These actions cannot be curtailed if the population is allowed to expand. You could not produce enough food with out the burning of fossil fuels by farm machinery, pumps that irrigate and transportation in delivering product to consumers thousands of miles away from the farm.

It is far more merciful for out reach programs to sterilize every second child where there is no birth control in desperate over populated countries. Than it is to allow children to be born into starvation and war zones fighting for space.

If they manage the population the other parts of controlling greenhouse gasses will naturally fall into line. It is the only viable control.

The world could probably sustain 4 to 5 Billion greater than that is into over bought territory

climatecentral.org

theguardian.com