Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (128542)	1/18/2017 12:26:02 PM
From: Pogeu Mahone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218465

Luntz better stop eating those chicken dinners where he expounds his BS.. He came unhinged with Trump..

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (128542)	1/18/2017 6:51:45 PM
From: dvdw©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218465

Appreciate this reply as a part of a productive exchange. Yet, it fails to address the issue raised within my first reply that AI would be predictive. The expansion offered in your reply here is fun, so an additional outtake from the piece attributed to your surmise is " While AI may heuristically converge on the same answer as a logic-tree, logic-trees will often fail where AI succeeds." The subsequent information by no means proves the surmise as true. Can you provide some study or analysis to support that? Logic Trees are in use, as are emergent schemes for AI which might best be attributed to the necessity due to failed attempts to argue logically, with more complex scenarios.. But we are not here to discuss the limited range of signals your AI is capable of. AI as its being defined may or may not have the necessary range to deal with more advanced forms of communications such as those implied by HAPUC. Because at this writing, Lutz or any other element of your systems sensory organs, are still, and for the near future will remain constrained, by the limitations of a need to know construction, imposed by compartmentalization. AI is simply an attempt to maintain, every veil of secrecy, so that deconstruction of the compartmental nature of in place systems can be forestalled. Transparency and forthright openness depends on a different mind /value set. AI doubtfully has range enough for feeling, and emotion, natural systems routinely employ. There is massive information gaps in your systems, specifically within its sensory organs. These gaps, enable the kinds of behaviors which society at large is parting with, discernment is a tricky space, compounded when knowing information outputs have been so wrong as to leave everyone wanting.