To: FJB who wrote (623243 ) 1/24/2017 5:04:25 PM From: LindyBill 5 RecommendationsRecommended By D. Long dave rose FJB lightshipsailor Stan
Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793964 I like this guy! In his articles, Congressional testimony, [23] and his 2016 book, Defeating Jihad: The Winnable War , [7] Gorka claims that since 9/11 America has become superb at applying force against high value terrorist targets, whether through the use of drone strikes or Special Operations raids, but is still losing the war against what he terms the "Global Jihadi Movement" (GJM). This lack of success is the result, according to Gorka, of America failing to counter the ideology of Global Jihadism and the Obama Administration's belief that terrorism is the result of unemployment and lack of education instead of ideology. Gorka has argued [24] that America acts astrategically due in part to the influence of the Cold War. According to Gorka, This lack of strategic behavior has made decision makers and strategists reactive instead of proactive and fundamentally incapable of prioritizing American national interests. Gorka has claimed that Carl von Clausewitz 's writings (or flawed interpretations of his works) have had a negative impact on the Western understanding of unconventional warfare. [25] In the post-2001 debate between the pro- and anti- Counter-insurgency (COIN) circles, Gorka has argued that COIN and FM 3-24, or the so-called "Petraeus Manual", were un-American approaches and fatally flawed choices for both Iraq and Afghanistan. Gorka has frequently criticized [26] the intrusion of politics and what he describes as political correctness into counterterrorism practices and policies. Gorka has claimed that both the Bush and Obama administrations have excised mention of religion when analyzing and discussing the terrorist threat, which he says has made America less capable of defeating groups like Al Qaeda or the Islamic State. Gorka has advocated the teaching of works of key Jihadist theorists within the military and law enforcement communities and the inclusion of their Enemy Threat Doctrine within the intelligence cycle. [23]