Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (996239)	1/24/2017 11:10:15 PM
From: Bill	1 Recommendation Recommended By jlallen Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571245

No. There are three pages, 1. a front page of NY state return which shows a $900k negative gross income but no second page showing taxes, 2. a CT state return with negative income and no taxes, 3. a NJ return that shows $96k in state taxes paid. There is no federal return, which would have to show some amount of payroll taxes paid that year based on the information in the NY and NJ returns. This has nothing to do with years before or after, even if he spread his federal loss over multiple years. You have no idea what the income was in the following years. You simply do not have enough information to make the absurd declaration that he paid no taxes.