Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeff Harrington who wrote (33280)	1/5/1998 1:08:00 PM
From: s martin	Respond to of 55532

Kugler has stated many times that he has no financial interest in RMIL , many of us who have looked into the claims being made here have also stated the same. Accusations by the "Ideal Order" can't change the facts you may be able to make "camera lenses glow" LOL.. but you can't change the facts. panacea.phys.utk.edu "During the same period while Jeffrey was employed at Liberty Audio/Video he had begun experimenting with a capability developed as an offshoot to his Zen meditative practices. He discovered that he could cause broadcasting television camera lenses to glow. He began using this luminescent effect as a tool to harass media and politicians. The process is called IdEAL ORDER Psychic TV."

To: Jeff Harrington who wrote (33280)	1/5/1998 1:10:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Jeff, I don't care what Mike Kugler is or isn't. GET THAT STRAIGHT RIGHT NOW!!! What I care about is the circus you "Yeahs" have made of the internet. Many people like to discuss the pros and cons of a stock in determining how to make an even and balanced decision. But you Yeahs have tilted the balance so far to your side through speculation, supposition, and hype over this "short squeeze" that many people, to include myself, feel compelled to provide the other side. But then I guess your (Yeahs) idea of talking about a stock is to avoid answering hard question, accuse others of slamming your stock, and attempting to bring enforcement agencies into this to prevent negative perspectives from being presented. I thought this was 1998, not 1984. As an anarchist artist, I would have to believe that you don't want Pugs to whine to the SEC that someone out here is calling him on the carpet for his hype??? Or would you??? Pugs, send this one too. Regards, Ron