SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CellularVision (CVUS): 2-way LMDS wireless cable. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brian Coakley who wrote (811)1/5/1998 3:33:00 PM
From: Bernard Levy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2063
 
WCII has valuable licenses, but its debt is extremely
large (in fact its book value/sh is less than CVUS's).
I think that WCII shareholders are too optimistic about
the prospect they will be bought out by AT&T. They are
looking too much at the takeover from a WCII perspective.
They should look at it also from an AT&T perspective:

a) Because WCII has such a high cash burn, AT&T can afford
to be patient and wait until WCII's cash starts to run
low. I think that the $60 /sh takeover estimates are
way too optimistic. Is AT&T plays its card rights, we
could see a revisit of the mid- to high-teens for WCII's
share price, followed by a takeover in the $25 to $35
range. A high takeover price would be difficult to sell
to AT&T shareholders.

b) The WCII-AT&T match is not perfect. WCII targets primarily
small or medium size businesses as customers, but this
is a group which tends to use MCI and Sprint for long
distance service. By opposition, AT&T tends to be strong
with residential customers. If the idea is to bundle short-
and long-distance services, AT&T needs to buy out a
wireless company which targets residential customers.

In spite of the above comments, I agree that WCII is
better managed and with a sharper strategic vision than
CVUS. However, its debt burden and heavy cost of operations
are serious negatives.