Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Graphene -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DinoNavarre who wrote (328)	1/29/2017 2:09:28 PM
From: DanD	1 Recommendation Recommended By Hawkmoon Respond to of 423

We need to recruit someone with the scientific knowledge to the board to answer these questions . But explosions creating Graphene does have a certain appeal. :)

To: DinoNavarre who wrote (328)	1/29/2017 3:06:09 PM
From: DanD	3 Recommendations Recommended By DinoNavarre Hawkmoon HerbVic Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 423

I went and looked at the patent. patft.uspto.gov It seems simple even for me to understand. The cylinder isn't that big and produces 7.4 grams of Graphene. And the document says it can be scaled up to produce 300 grams an hour. So you could have a factory of nothing more complicated than an internal combustion cylinder with thousands of these things running producing graphene tonnes of graphene a day very cheap. So if the data is correct. It does sound pretty great. The investment question is who will take the risk of building that factory betting on this being best method? Definitely worth following. Dan D.