Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alastair McIntosh who wrote (74529)	1/29/2017 4:23:45 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86355

I'm not having any other conversations about that specific issue anywhere else so if I'm not doing it in this conversation I'm not doing it. Which doesn't mean I've never done it or never will, but it isn't happening now. The plot shows temperatures relative to 1900 - 1920. Yes it shows changers since that period. One would expect, in a situation of general warming, for the temperatures both on the raw and adjusted data to be higher now. But there isn't any good reason for the differences between the raw and adjusted temperatures to be higher now. The fact that around 1910 there is almost no difference between the raw and adjusted temperatures indicates very little adjustment. The fact that in recent years there is a noticeable difference between raw and adjusted temperatures indicates a larger adjustment