Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (9647)	2/5/2017 3:46:06 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 357136

Yep. That's McConnell for you. I would not disagree that maybe it is an issue for the states, but it might be a place for federal to codify standards for control since federal elections are at stake as well. Look, I don't know if it is a big problem or not. I don't believe we're having 100s of thousands of fraudulent votes cast, but the truth is I wouldn't know if we were. Even if controls are great in NY, who knows whether they are in Arkansas? I don't. I'm somewhat sympathetic to the idea that people aren't really motivated to fraudulently vote. But there is a lot of money in the system. Do you think, 50 years from now, we'll (they'll lol) still be using this archaic voting system?