Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (999528)	2/8/2017 1:48:56 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575765

Melania's lawsuit could backfire on Trump, Inc-- Bigly: We can all thank Melania Trump for giving us a clearer sense of what she and her family are looking for from their stay in the White House. In court papers Melania filed on Monday as part of a libel lawsuit against the parent company of the Daily Mail, she said that the British tabloid and web site, by falsely reporting that she had once worked as a prostitute, caused the first lady to miss “major business opportunities” and “multimillion-dollar relationships.” The lawsuit, first reported by the New York Post on Tuesday evening, said Melania’s missed deals would have involved such products as “apparel, accessories, shoes, jewelry, cosmetics, hair care, skin care, and fragrance.” Melania’s role as first lady to President Donald Trump would have offered her a “once-in-a-lifetime” opportunity to cash in on such deals, the lawsuit noted, but the reputational damage done by the Daily Mail had disrupted those plans. Amid a little swirl of social media attention for the case yesterday, Melania’s spokespeople said that reporters and others had misinterpreted the language in the suit and that the first lady had “no intention” of trying to profit from her White House role. Since she is seeking at least $150 million in damages stemming from missed business opportunities, the lawyers representing the Daily Mail should eventually avail themselves of their discovery powers to secure each and every e-mail, communique and document about White House business prospects that the Trump parents and children discussed. They should also subpoena the Trump family’s tax returns and banking records while they’re at it. If President Trump isn’t inclined to release his tax returns or be more transparent about his business dealings, then maybe the courts can help him along. bloomberg.com

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (999528)	2/8/2017 1:52:00 PM
From: jlallen	1 Recommendation Recommended By Mick Mørmøny Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575765

LOL!!! Wrong! How does that put himself before the country....are you really that stupid?