Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (999546)	2/8/2017 2:48:54 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574679

"how is your permanent California drought going?" It's easing. There's a new report out tomorrow. Dam … some very impressive numbers.. Shasta added 130K acre feet yesterday, Oroville almost 160K, Fosom 106K. One I watch is San Luis, which is off-stream storage for XS water coming from the Delta. It’s now 88% of capacity, 1M acre feet above last year. cdec.water.ca.gov it’s gonna be full-tilt boogie for the farmers this year. Unemployment in the Valley should drop. Raining pretty good here at the moment…still…again. I’m prolly close to 70 inches for the season; the last time I checked our weekly paper, town was at 56?, and I get more. 25 miles south of me, Willits just passed their seasonal average. This is from the SF Chronicle… weather.sfgate.com "Maybe I should ask how solar panels work when its raining?" Not as well as hydro; this would have been a good year to plug in my creek.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (999546)	2/9/2017 2:13:46 AM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1574679

Breaking News... Top Republicans swear that climate change is real. Republican elders call for new national carbon tax to replace federal regulations GOP elder statesmen urge Donald Trump’s administration to impose a ‘free market, limited government’ response to rising global temperatures The Republican group’s plan outlines a carbon tax of $40 for each ton emitted. Photograph: Jim Cole/AP Oliver Milman @olliemilman Wednesday 8 February 2017 16.50 GMT Last modified on Wednesday 8 February 2017 16.56 GMT A group of senior Republicans will meet with White House officials on Wednesday to call for a new national carbon tax to replace federal regulations as a way to combat climate change. The GOP elder statesmen – which include former secretaries of state James Baker and George Shultz, and ex-treasury secretary Hank Paulson – will urge Donald Trump’s administration to impose a “free market, limited government” response to rising global temperatures. Trump interior secretary pick on climate change: 'I don’t believe it’s a hoax' Read more theguardian.com The group’s plan outlines a carbon tax of $40 for each ton emitted, which would increase steadily over time. In an attempt to appeal to Republicans wary of new taxes, the plan stipulates that income from this levy would be distributed to the American public on a quarterly basis. “Mounting evidence of climate change is growing too strong to ignore,” the group states. “For too long, many Republicans have looked the other way, forfeiting the policy initiative to those who favor growth-inhibiting command-and-control regulations.” The plan would also sweep away federal regulations limiting carbon dioxide emissions. Barack Obama, faced by stiff Republican opposition to a similar market-based carbon plan, deployed the Environmental Protection Agency to draw up rules the directly curb emissions via the clean power plan. This new proposal estimates that a family of four would receive about $2,000 a year in dividends, offsetting any increase in fuel costs that would occur as a result of the tax. “Carbon dividends would increase the disposable income of the majority of Americans while disproportionately helping those struggling to make ends meet,” the report states. “Yet these dividends are not giveaways; they would be earned based on the good behavior of minimizing our carbon footprints.” Trump’s antipathy towards climate science, which he has previously called a “hoax” and mere ploy to impose new taxes, suggests that the group of Republicans will struggle to win the president over. Obama’s clean power plan is already slated for abolition, with Trump suggesting the US could also retreat from the international effort to tackle climate change. Congressional Republicans, too, have voiced doubts over the validity of the science and have consistently opposed any new taxes and any restrictions upon greenhouse gas emissions. Baker, who was secretary of state under George HW Bush, conceded his group faces an “uphill slog” that may not be successful. “We may not convince the president, but it’s a good plan because it’s a conservative, free market and limited government approach to the problem,” he told CNN. “Republicans have not been at the table because we are skeptics or deniers. But if you see what’s happening to the environment, even if it’s happened before 10,000 years ago, that’s a risk we shouldn’t have to take.” Support for a carbon tax has support in diverse places, including ExxonMobil, the world’s largest oil company, former vice-president Al Gore and James Hansen, the former Nasa scientist-turned-climate campaigner. Proponents argue the most efficient way to cut emissions would be a tax that spurs large greenhouse gas emitters to switch to cleaner sources of energy. Rex Tillerson, the former ExxonMobile chief executive and Trump’s pick for secretary of state, has said he supports a “revenue neutral” carbon fee. The idea of a carbon tax will also garner support among progressives who were left deflated after Obama’s initial attempts to institute a national cap-and-trade carbon system were scuppered by Republican opposition. Trump and the GOP may be trying to kneecap climate research Read more theguardian.com “It’s a sensible alternative and this group is probably the best possible messengers for this particular president and Congress,” said Andrew Light, a former senior climate negotiator at the department of state during Obama’s administration. “The structure of this plan should appeal to Republicans because it returns the money from the tax to citizens. We need some action, we need to get to the emissions cuts. This could help us get there.” Environmental groups were cautiously supportive but warned that the tax shouldn’t come at the cost of rolling back clean air laws. “We have a moral obligation to protect future generations from the growing dangers of climate change,” said Rhea Suh, president of the Natural Resources Defense Council. “Effective action means building on the progress we’re already making, not sacrificing those gains by weakening the laws Congress has already passed.” theguardian.com