SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: yard_man who wrote (25296)1/5/1998 6:10:00 PM
From: bob s  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 132070
 
Barry/MB-It would be interesting to get all the tech bearish Mohan thread people responses to Murphy's logic (which to me seems OK) yet I know he had been basically wrong on tech and biotech sector at least during 1997. Bob



To: yard_man who wrote (25296)1/6/1998 11:59:00 AM
From: Thomas M.  Respond to of 132070
 
...From his offices in Half Moon Bay...

I should be able to make a good joke out of this. Help, anyone? Murphy's track record speaks for itself. Anyone investing exclusively in tech since 1990 should be beating the S&P 500 the way Duke beat Maryland the other night. Sadly, he's barely keeping up.

Tom



To: yard_man who wrote (25296)1/6/1998 12:48:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Respond to of 132070
 
Barry, They are certainly better buys than when he recommended them earlier in 1997. -g-

However, I am peeved by the fact that the papers always print his age. I never have liked that concept. Does age determine whether or not we should listen to a guy? My feeling is that age only matters if you can tell somebody's age by his or her opinions. Thus my constant criticism of the 12-year old analysts on Wall Street and their 13 year old fund manager buddies. -g-

MB


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News