Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Zenyatta Free Speech Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chupacabra1 who wrote (15177)	2/8/2017 10:08:21 PM
From: NuclearCrystals	1 Recommendation Recommended By hoperrs Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22811

Chupa, it's an interesting situation here .............. you look at Stockwatch data and draw a conclusion because you have complete faith that Stockwatch is accurate. Chief supplies information that makes the Stockwatch data inaccurate ........... the veracity of which could only be questioned if you don't believe his source of information. It doesn't have to be complicated ........ the Zennanite claim is Bruce Duncan (CEO of Canada Carbon Inc) had a role in 30 failed companies, the failure being his doing. Check insider reports at Sedi .......... if Duncan had a control influence on a reporting company, he would show up as an insider and it would have to match up with the Stockwatch data, no? Of course, if the company in question was private ........... there wouldn't be any Sedi reports nor would Stockwatch have any participant data on them. You Zennanites are trying to sully Bruce Duncans name by making up stories of failure of companies at his doing when in fact he has made a lot of people some serious coin in many a venture ............ in addition ........... he has made a shit load of money for himself through various venture capital investments, none of which would or could be considered a failure. If you really want to pursue this ........ do some cross referencing and strengthen your position by showing more than a flawed Stockwatch data entry ......... prove it if you can.

To: Chupacabra1 who wrote (15177)	2/8/2017 10:34:46 PM
From: the Chief	3 Recommendations Recommended By Edwinder12 Gilmar1 hoperrs Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22811

Not going to debate a SH database. Goto Sedi that is the authorized and only valid list of insider rolls in companies. I have checked with Mr Duncan and he has confirmed the list I have created is correct. So whether you believe it or not, or whether you wish to believe SH over SEDI is up to you. I do not intend on arguing with you either. I have set the record straight. SEDI is the authority not SH. Much like you may or may not accept the $242trillion Muskie has stated or not, is equally as irrelevant. When I do research, I do so using the accepted standards for the data.