Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Zenyatta Free Speech Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chupacabra1 who wrote (15193)	2/9/2017 10:50:20 AM
From: the Chief	1 Recommendation Recommended By hoperrs Respond to of 22811

Industry Professionals cannot be bothered with what SH or SW has in their database. In most cases if its contested, then the industry professional has to prove SH or SW has the info wrong, not the other way around. Since both are used by amateurs, they do not bother. Its an irrelevant group of data. This is why the 14 and others rely on it, they are amateurs pretending to have a clue.

To: Chupacabra1 who wrote (15193)	2/9/2017 10:52:13 AM
From: Fact Czecher	2 Recommendations Recommended By GrumpyGus hoperrs Respond to of 22811

Chuppie posted: SH I don't know what it stands for. A couple hours later he posted: He seems to be quick to remove posts on that SH site on a daily basis "Oh! What a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive"

To: Chupacabra1 who wrote (15193)	2/9/2017 10:58:55 AM
From: ThatsTheTruth	1 Recommendation Recommended By llama1337 Respond to of 22811

I don't know why I can see your posts when I have you on ignore. A database such as StockWatch type sites provide is only a starting point for proper due diligence. If something there interests you, you then have to access public records and obtain further information to confirm and give you more context. The only thing that is clear is that none of you ever bothered to do that. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that there is a disclaimer on the SW pages that waives any responsibility for errors blah blah. That should be the clue that all may not be as it seems. And that should limit the faith invested in it and interpretations applied to it. TTT

To: Chupacabra1 who wrote (15193)	2/9/2017 11:07:24 AM
From: the Chief	1 Recommendation Recommended By hoperrs Respond to of 22811

Perhaps this may help you. An insider can be taken to court and charged/fined for filing incorrect data to SEDI. SH and SW are irrelevant data. So if you were at all concerned with accuracy, would you not go to the database that threatens the very existence of an insider within the Regulatory domain? Its not a matter of paying $100 for SW because I am cheap, I do not pay the $100 because the data is useless and inaccurate. So whom is the person pissing away the $100 you or me? I piss away $220US for Esignal for data and charts. I use SEDI and SEDAR for data. So whom is using accurate data, you or me?