Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (74782)	2/9/2017 11:05:58 AM
From: Eric	Respond to of 86356

I must admit that I'm entertained by all of your conspiracy theory's!

To: Brumar89 who wrote (74782)	2/9/2017 11:12:35 AM
From: Brumar89	1 Recommendation Recommended By Thomas A Watson Respond to of 86356

All global temperature data will continue to be bunkum until (a) there is an agreed definition of global temperature that does not frequently alter and (b) there is some possibility of an independent calibration standard for global temperature. The past is the past. Some things about the past, we can know. “Global” temperature is not one of those things. A BIG hint is that they have to “adjust” the number somebody reading a thermometer wrote down a hundred years ago. Even if the number WAS wrong, there is no way to know what the correct number should have been. It’s adjusted to find the “right” number that fits what they or a software program says it should have been. I’d add a (c) The actual science must be done before and independent of political/ideological influence becomes involved. But I guess that brings us back to what I’ve said before, the problem with the most perfect system Mankind can devise is that there are people in it. Gunga Din February 7, 2017 at 2:17 pm