Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CSGI ...READY FOR TAKE-OFF! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Trader X who wrote (1927)	1/5/1998 7:06:00 PM
From: tech	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3391

________To all ConSyGen Investors and Interested Parties.____________ It is now clear that the NASD review, by itself, can not prevent ConSyGen from getting a NASDAQ listing. However, the results of this review may or may not have a influence on the listing process. It is my opinion that the outcome of this review WILL NOT have any influence on the NASDAQ listing. I feel that this review was a routine review done by NASD and the fact that they have not had any further communication with the company in over 8 months is important to note. In the last week or two, you have seen the blatant attempts by Mr. Kevin Hansen and angel to post false and misleading information regarding ConSyGen's ability to receive a NASDAQ listing while this review is still pending. Both Mr. Hansen and angel continually posted that the fact that ConSyGen has a pending review, regardless of the outcome, was enough to prevent a NASDAQ listing. Is has now become evident that both Mr. Hansen and angel were posting false and misleading information. Angel even went as far as to "claim" he called NASDAQ and they informed him that no company with a pending review would be approved. It is now clear that angel purposely, knowingly, and intentionally posted false information regarding this so-called conversation. Even Mr. Hansen's own conversations with NASDAQ proved that angel's post regarding this issue was a complete fabrication. Now that the facts have become clear, Mr. Hansen has decided to back track and try to justify his misleading and false posts by indicating he said "I believe" the NASD review would prevent the listing." However when we check his original posts no such wording was used. It should be very clear to everyone who reads this thread that both Mr. Hansen and angel have consistenty posted false and misleading information.