SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: one_less who wrote (10602)2/12/2017 10:00:53 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 361653
 
The Big Bang is to the Universe like Evolution is to life on Earth. Neither tries to deal with what came before them. They are both explanations of how the currently observed system changed over history. Both are rock solid in that respect, with overwhelming evidence in support of them. The Big Bang does not attempt to explain what came before, and Evolution does not attempt to explain abiogenesis.



To: one_less who wrote (10602)2/12/2017 10:21:46 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 361653
 
First the Big Bang has to Bang something that existed, usually called singularity.

Ok.

Second if something existed, it existed prior to the Big Bang

Not necessarily. Some of the implications of quantum mechanics, especially in a multi-dimensional space, is that matter and energy can be created out of essentially nothing. And there is no reason to suspect there was only one universe created.

and the question of "how so" and was something going on be for singularity cannot be answered using Big Bang as a theory of origin.

Technically speaking, the Big Bang theory, or one of its variants, cannot be a theory of origin. Because it starts with a singularity. Do you know what that means? It is called a "singularity" because it is impossible to know what was there before. If anything. All information has been wiped clean. Including the fundamental constants.