Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bart13 who wrote (130401)	2/14/2017 2:26:00 PM
From: Elroy Jetson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217603

To: bart13 who wrote (130401)	2/14/2017 2:27:15 PM
From: bart13	Respond to of 217603

‘What if the real objective is support for restricting the power of the USDC to judicially review certain actions of the executive branch, or certain congressional legislation?’ <http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/02/the_real_significance_of_the_temporary_immigration_ban.html> ————————————— Congress certainly has the power to establish a special immigration court which hears all admission cases and from which there is no appeal except direct to USSC. It could do this with a majority vote in both houses. Whether it has that majority in each house is not so clear; possibly, particularly if the District and Appeals Courts continue trying to adjudicate clearly executive and legislative matters – what the USSC has usually called “political matters” – and substitute judicial judgment for that of the President or Congress or both. And continues active rebellion like the DC situation. But that is the nature of a Constitutional Crisis.