Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : PRTI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael d kugler who wrote (330)	1/5/1998 10:51:00 PM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 424

Were in the 8K does it say that RMCW will not be actively pursuing the MVPH $14 million in assets. The 8K says that RMIL is not making this part of the merger agreement. I love this as it saves RMIL 6 million Rule 144 shares in 1 year, plus if RMCW does get the assets later. Then RMCW can sell it off or do whatever they wish! A possible Win-Win Situation for all shareholders. Another example of your sick and twisted spinn on positive news! Shareholders maybe coming after YOU in a classaction suit. I can feel your need to tank RMIL as I believe that you may be getting a benefit for being here! I'll let a jury decide the damages that you and others may wind up paying us RMIL shareholders! Riley G -------- 6.Ref. Rocky Mountain Crystal Water, Inc. An 8K dated 10/7/97 was filed reference the merger of Rocky Mountain Crystal Water, Inc., and Olympus Ventures, Inc. In this agreement Rocky Mountain was to transfer 4,000,000 shares of MVP Holdings, with a guaranteed value of $14,000,000 at the end of the twelfth month of the merger. In this agreement the Company held back 6,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock as protection against the asset not being available at the end of the required time. An amendment to the agreement has removed the 4,000,000 shares and the Company will not issue the 6,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock. Per the agreement with Rocky Mountain Crystal Water, Inc. was to receive $5,000,000 from an outside investor within 30 days of the signing. Since that date the Company has given two 30 day extensions. The Company has received a copy of a letter from the investor dated January 1 1998, advising Rocky Mountain Crystal Water, Inc. that the funds were in processing at this time, the Company has now given another 30-day extension due to the above mentioned letter. ------------------ Message from michael d kugler on Jan 5 1998 8:45PM EST Michael, I just took the hike to the 8-K. It appears as though you have incessantly lied to people here. Perhaps you should apologize. For the benefit of people here, RMIL just filed an 8-K which says they have abandoned their quest for the 4 million MVPH shares. So all posters should be very careful when listening to Michael Weber. He lies.

To: michael d kugler who wrote (330)	1/5/1998 11:58:00 PM
From: Michael P. Weber	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 424

Michael (AKA Stock Broker for Principal Financial Securities), Apparently you can't read. For the benefit of the people that read this board, this is what was stated in the 8K for RMIL: <<<An 8K dated 10/7/97 was filed reference the merger of Rocky Mountain Crystal Water, Inc., and Olympus Ventures, Inc. In this agreement Rocky Mountain was to transfer 4,000,000 shares of MVP Holdings, with a guaranteed value of $14,000,000 at the end of the twelfth month of the merger. In this agreement the Company held back 6,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock as protection against the asset not being available at the end of the required time. An amendment to the agreement has removed the 4,000,000 shares and the Company will not issue the 6,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock.>>> Nowhere here does it state that they have abandoned their quest as you call it for the 4mil MVPH. It does appear as though it is no longer a requirement of the merger to transfer the 4mil MVPH shares by the end of the 12 month period. Note: This does not say anywhere that they will not legally pursue the 4 mil shares along with the augmentation agreement that are rightfully RMCW's per a contractual agreement. If I am wrong I am man enough to admit it, but so far I'm not wrong and I'll not let the likes of you BASH RMIL or it's shareholders. Perhaps you should apologize to me and the posters on this board, because you obviously have a reading comprehension problem! Kugler you are trying to twist what was published so it appears the way you want it to read. In doing so you are lieing to the people here on this board. Tell them the truth...you in fact don't know any more than has been published in the 8K today. So therefore you are guessing and you owe me an apology! Per PRTI's Attorney on 1/5/98 - PRTI assigned the 4 mil shares of MVPH to RMCW because they claimed in essence 15Mil in damages. <EOD>