Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1000888)	2/19/2017 1:56:00 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576113

>> I'm pretty sure he'd be tearing his hair out and screaming "WTF is wrong with deniers?" So would Einstein, and he had a lot more to pull. I'm not sure about Einstein as I don't know his take on the Scientific Method. I do know what Feynman thought about it, and what the so-called "climate scientists" are doing today would not pass muster. It just wouldn't. Feynman almost assuredly would be in the Freeman Dysan camp today. Unlike so many other theoretical physicists, these two were deeply serious about experimental physics as well as the theoretical realm. I believe Feynman was a different kind of scientist with an extremely open-minded take on the physical world. He certainly would have have considered the theoretical basis of it early and believed it was at least good theory. But the evidence is not good and he would have recognized it.