Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Fintas who wrote (104213)	2/22/2017 10:59:16 AM
From: MythMan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116837

Wrong all I said was it was just a simple 2500 before 1458.

To: Fintas who wrote (104213)	3/2/2017 9:51:39 PM
From: MythMan	Respond to of 116837

>>Rarebird.. it was more than 2 years ago. And he asserted the 2500 would be hit in each of the years he missed. And has been wrong.<< That is fake news but you can prove it to me if you can find the post. I said 2500 before 1458 and it wasn't 2 years ago. Now here is someone who raises that bar... Message 31011417 Looks good to me. What does the tic tac toe model say?

To: Fintas who wrote (104213)	3/4/2017 9:45:43 PM
From: Rarebird	Respond to of 116837

<<Well heck then put up his/her credentials. >> Fintas - the proof is in the pudding. Myth came out with the earliest 2500 call of any S&P analyst. It was a briilliant call. That call, as you know, went beyond any black box, any conceivable PNF box, that call was the most outrageous, courageous call that only a man of talent, genius, could make. In the interest of fair play, Fintas, you need to acknowledge the gift that Myth has. Myth's call is on the verge of trumping all PNF and showing what a farce PNF is. Myth deserves respect for his call. You owe at least that much to Myth.