SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MCsweet who wrote (59105)2/27/2017 12:27:38 PM
From: Lazarus  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78740
 
All good reasons to be concerned, I suppose. I speculate that if there is even a modest increase in defense spending that IEHC will benefit.

I've asked my son, a summa cum laude graduate in Electrical Engineering, who designs components from scratch, to take a look at their products. So far no luck in getting any feedback. He did help me choose a decent bidet for our guest bathroom though.

I love great fundamentals but admit to being an inveterate speculator ---> if I suspect the sun, moon, and stars are aligning themselves just so.

...So I will even venture into stocks like EKCS in hopes for a turnaround - when things look fundamentally crappy... but futuristically hopeful.



To: MCsweet who wrote (59105)3/8/2017 1:52:43 PM
From: Graham Osborn  Respond to of 78740
 
Working capital consisting mostly of inventories are a recurring problem for this company. I don't like it, but I understand why they do it.

I'm no expert on pension liabilities but my reading of the below is that they may not be in compliance with the 1990 act. That would be an incentive to avoid calculating pension liabilities under the new rules. I'm not sure how closely ERISA monitors companies of this size.