Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1002355)	2/26/2017 11:24:43 AM
From: Land Shark	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1572208

That chart is a bit old... Temperatures have recently overshot Hansen's model making its predictions on the conservative side. Lindzen should have his academic credentials revoked because of his conflicts of interest in taking money from the hydrocarbon industries.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1002355)	2/26/2017 11:30:17 AM
From: Land Shark	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572208

Arguing with a climate change denier (the goat)... More opinions of climate change deniers:

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1002355)	2/26/2017 3:50:18 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572208

lying asshole troll ratie posts some anonymous chart. But no signed letters. While we support effective, affordable, reasonable and direct controls on conventional environmental pollutants, carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. To the contrary, there is clear evidence that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide is environmentally helpful to food crops and other plants that nourish all life. It is plant food, not poison. Restricting access to fossil fuels has very negative effects upon the wellbeing of people around the world. It condemns over 4 billion people in still underdeveloped countries to continued poverty. Does NOAA post information making the above statement obvious truth. Change in leaf area.....