Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CYRIX / NSM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Big Bucks who wrote (22648)	1/6/1998 12:54:00 AM
From: Joe NYC	Respond to of 33344

BB, I think the numbers Yousef posted are sales (revenue) per employee. Joe

To: Big Bucks who wrote (22648)	1/6/1998 1:14:00 AM
From: Yousef	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 33344

BigBucks, Re: "I am not surprised that Intel has such a large dollar amount per employee ..." Well you should be ... this goes directly against your earlier "unsupported" statement about Intel having more overhead. This metric shows that Intel has lower overhead and more employees directly contributing to revenue generation. BTW, NSM/CYRX considers this metric important enough to post on their WebSite. Re: "What % of total company revenues does this represent per employee." This metric makes no sense ... For example, if I had my own business and was the lone employee, then I would contribute 100% of revenue ... even if I only made $1000/year for my company. Really BigBucks, you should give a little more thought to your posts. Make It So, Yousef