Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CSGI ...READY FOR TAKE-OFF! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tech who wrote (1958)	1/6/1998 1:32:00 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 3391

Tech, I believe, err... I know for a fact, that the full text by Kevin Hansen is thus: Also, the $4 price bottom for a NASD listing is moot, since SCGI* is still has an NASD stock trading investigation open--unresolved--that will prevent them from getting a listing anyway.* So, if you want to play a game of semantics... - Jeff P.S. I think Tech is in trouble. Where is Ted when you need him?

To: tech who wrote (1958)	1/6/1998 10:04:00 AM
From: Trader X	Respond to of 3391

TO ALL, TO ALL, AND TO ALL A GOOD NIGHT... Speaking of being exposd, did tech use the word believe when he wrote: Message 3072141 From: tech Wednesday, Nov 12 1997 7:49PM EST Yahoo will go below $40 tomorrow. Without a doubt. There are 33 sellers for every ten buyers....no one wants to own an overvalued stock right now when you can buy a discounted stock somewhere else. See ya, Yahoo. Yahoo. Yahoo. That's the sound it makes when it flushes down the toilet to $30. -- THE NASD PERFORMED A "ROUTINE REVIEW" OVER A YEAR AGO AND THAT THE COMPANY REPLIED BACK TO THEM AND HAS NOT EVER HEARD ANYTHING BACK. Oops! Not according to the latest SEC filing! Accourding that filing, the review is niether "ROUTINE" or "PERFORMED" (completed) and the NASD HAS questioned them further after the initial round. Was tech purposely giving false information? Or was he simply ignorant of the truth? -- again: techstocks.com <<the company responded to the NASD questions in writing, and the NASD has not contacted the company since then.>> WRONG! Read the SEC filings, tech.