SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: elmatador who wrote (131411)3/5/2017 7:28:41 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218308
 
neah ... the so called china lite is merely part of full spectrum china, and nothing lite except to the unaware operating from false premise

team china, bored of being the planet's top gold producer as well as importer, and export so very little gold, is tracking well to become the top producer of both alt-diamond as well as polished natural diamond

would seem that two members of the 5 old BRICS are in line for collateral damage

sure beats selling t-shirts and marketing plastic flowers, and highly unlikely that china would be importing alt-diamonds from either vietnam or myanmar

same same for solar everything, nuclear reactor anything, and whatever else to rollover, roll up or just roll

sure am glad true gold cannot be manufactured

but diamonds and alt-swish watches can, along w/ volvos, cell phones, and whatever else that can come out of a factory to supply at least three out of a few continents

correct premise, when truly overarching, is everything that underpins a sustainable conviction

scmp.com

China’s lab-grown diamond industry has De Beers fighting back
5 Mar 2017 - 10:30pm
The spread of synthetic diamonds in China, originally designed for industrial purposes such as oil drilling, is posing such a threat to the global diamond market that it has forced dominant player De Beers to invest tens of millions of dollars on methods to identify the man-made stones that look exactly like the real thing.

A team of scientists at the mining giant are dedicated to fundamental research into the difference between synthetic and natural diamonds, while others work around the clock developing high-tech machines capable of screening out these tiny, “fake” gemstones, a popular investment among jewellery makers, particularly for those in China and India.

“They want to be confident in the diamonds they are buying for their business or selling to jewellery retailers,” Jonathan Kendall, president of De Beers’ International Institute of Diamond Grading and Research, told the South China Morning Post in an interview. For years, Kendall has led a team of researchers in London in the fight against synthetic diamonds being sold as real ones.

World diamond supply to peak in 2017, De Beers chief executive says

Indeed, even the most experienced diamantaire’s in the world can’t tell the fakes from those extracted from mines when using their naked eye, which is where technology comes in. More affordable prices, which are only seen dropping further over time, have already prompted budget shoppers to gravitate towards the man-made gems.

“The arrival of lab-grown diamonds has challenged the widely-held assumption that diamond prices could only increase because supply in natural diamonds has peaked and due to strong Asian demand,” said Georgette Boele, a coordinator of precious metals strategy at Dutch bank ABN Amro.

Created in labs in a matter of weeks, synthetic diamonds are chemically identical to the real thing. They are made from a diamond “seed” which grows new crystals with the help of carbon-containing gas in a microwave chamber operating at extremely high temperature and pressure.



Companies producing such stones have sprung up all over China, churning out an estimated 160,000 to 200,000 carats of gem-quality diamonds every month. That’s enough to propel the country to the world’s top spot in terms of synthetic production, industry insiders believe.

“About half of China’s diamond output comes from synthetics,” said Zu Endong, deputy director with the Gemological Institute of Yunnan, a Chinese province known as a gem-trading hub.

Lab-made diamonds account for a negligible 1 per cent of global rough diamond sales, yet their share may expand to 7.5 to 15 per cent by 2020, according to Morgan Stanley. The growth is likely to accelerate as more global marques jump on the bandwagon.In April, Swarovski was the first to unveil a line of so-called “created diamonds”, targeting ethically- and money-conscious millennials, who don’t want to support so-called “blood diamonds”.

While experts warn synthetics may erode the allure of the naturally mined stones adored by the wealthy in society, a looming issue is a surge in cases where undisclosed lab-grown gems were intercepted in diamond parcels circulating among the trade or in gem sets sold in Asia.

In a 2015 case in Shanghai, authorities found that 14 per cent of the rough diamonds and set jewellery in a sample labelled “natural” were man-made. Similar incidents happened in Mumbai, India, which is the world’s No.1 diamond exporting country.



Such incidents could well undermine buyers’ confidence, a major concern for any luxury goods retailer whose priority is to give consumers what they pay for.

Man-made diamonds trace their beginnings back to the 1950s when the mostly yellow to brown coloured stones were used in industrial applications due to their hardness.

It is only in the last half decade that technology has advanced to a level that scientists at De Beers, itself a pioneer in lab-grown diamond production, have been able to invent high-tech detectors that can trace the colourless synthetic versions.

“Much revolves around the use of lights and the analysis of certain natural diamonds. The burst of light into the stones is able to be interpreted in a scientific way,” Kendall said.

Diamonds may be forever, but they are not an investor’s best friend

Demand for these detecting machines is particularly robust in China, including Hong Kong, with about a third of the De Beers institute’s global sales shipped to the country, he added. For example, Hong Kong-based Chow Tai Fook, the world’s largest jeweller, is a top client.

“In China, they make lots of jewellery that will ultimately go all over the world in terms of purchasing. [Shoppers] will not be happy if they buy a very nice large stone and find that the small ones around it are not natural,”Kendall said.



While China’s nouveaux riche are driving growth of global diamond sales, the country’s booming output of natural polished diamonds is also challenging India’s long-held position as the world’s top diamond polisher, official data showed.

At a trade fair in Hong Kong on Tuesday De Beers unveiled its latest diamond verification technology, the coffee-machine sized AMS2 that costs US$45,000 – already a substantial discount to the US$65,000 price tag of its predecessor. Within the first few hours of its release, over a dozen orders had flooded in, the company said.

Much of the focus of the Anglo American PLC-owned De Beers is now on so-called “diamond melees,” gemstones normally less than 0.5 carats in weight and widely used in diamond-encrusted watches.

The AMS2 fires red spectrum light into the gems to detect fake melee stones and can process 500 carats per hour.

Why the illicit diamond trade is (almost) gone, but not yet forgotten

In the past most of the tiny lab-grown diamonds were used as drill bits. “[But] demand for drills has gone down dramatically with the decline of the oil industry, [so] such type of material was clearly passed onto the diamond marketplace,” Kendall said.

On the retail side, apart from stocking up on detectors at high cost, there is more to be done to contain the risks.

“As lab-grown diamonds become more indistinguishable over time, the marketing of natural stones is paramount,” said Zu from the Yunnan Gemological Institute.

Chow Tai Fook, for example, attached a unique serial number to each of its diamond stones under a brand it launched in August last year in order to make the jewellery pieces more trackable. “[The number represented] a resume of the diamond from procurement to manufacturing to reassure buyers that the diamond is all-natural,” a Chow Tai Fook spokesperson said.



To: elmatador who wrote (131411)3/6/2017 7:11:19 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 218308
 
Re <<China Light>>

... is this what you were going on about?

venturebeat.com

The top tech leaders and regions in the world: Shanghai on the rise

Dean Takahashi @deantak March 5, 2017 6:00 PM

Of the global innovation hubs, Shanghai is viewed as the leading hub for technology innovation over the next four years, according to a survey of executives by KPMG.

New York ranked as No. 2, followed by Tokyo, Beijing, London, Washington D.C., Berlin, Chicago, Tel Aviv, and Boston. The survey didn’t focus on Silicon Valley, which likely would have been a clear No. 1. But the conclusion of the survey is that Silicon Valley is going global.

Of the industry’s tech leaders, Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, came out No. 1 as a global innovation visionary. He was followed by Tim Cook of Apple, and a three-way tie among Jack Ma, Larry Page, and Sundar Pichai.

And the survey ranked the top companies driving innovation. The results of that question are below, with Google leading the pack.
KPMG surveyed more than 800 global tech leaders, from startup entrepreneurs to Fortune 500 executives.
The factors that matter in terms of innovation by region include the availability of talent, access to tech infrastructure, ability to drive customer adoption, access to alliances and partnerships, access to capital, and training and educational programs.

The report focused on the rise of 15 innovation hubs with ecosystems of incubators, accelerators, and venture capital, alongside government incentives across the world.
“The spread of tech innovation development is being fueled by growing ecosystems as technology innovation has permeated all industries,” the report said. “Technology continues to enable an unprecedented rise in creativity, across the world, to solve business problems and develop new markets in ways never thought possible.”

The U.S. remains strong. Five of the top six world’s largest companies are U.S. tech companies with over $2.5 trillion in market cap. The U.S. platform companies are leading the tech evolution with big investments in artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, and other technologies that will have great influence on the way businesses and consumers engage with the world.

“The U.S. tech landscape is morphing into a fourth transformation, as revolutionary new innovation surfaces. Face and voice recognition are going to become part of consumers’ lives in the United States and help to provide stronger privacy protection,” the report said. “Mobile communications, banking, and commerce are all adopting biometrics to make online transactions more secure.”

The startup boom in the U.S. continues to thrive, as fundraising increased from $35.2 billion in 2015 to $41.6 billion in 2016.

“While actual investment in startups has decreased slightly in recent quarters, the continued rise in fundraising activity and optimism from tech and investment leaders signal confidence in the United States as a commanding tower to generate ideas, create job opportunities, and advance the economy,” the report said. “Despite a thawing IPO market in the United States, venture-backed tech companies are finding exits through a surge in acquisitions and mergers.”

But China is on the rise. When it comes to future tech leaders, Shanghai got 26 percent of the vote, compared to 21 percent for Beijing. A year ago, Shanghai was ranked at 17 percent. New York got 23 percent of the vote, up from 19 percent a year ago. Tokyo got 21 percent.

“As tech innovations unfold, China is stacking up to the United States as a leading force. Global tech industry leaders indicated, in KPMG’s tech innovation survey, the United States and China are the world’s dominant tech epicenters — with the greatest potential to develop disruptive technology breakthroughs that will have a global impact,” the report said. “The strong showing for these two mega-powers is relatively consistent with earlier KPMG surveys, although this year’s poll reflects a slight uptick for China — 25 percent compared with 23 percent the prior year.”