Humbly report, Mike, this is my last post to you - in public and in private. Congratulations, you have just made #1 on my list of scumbags. Why? Not because you don't know diddly about TPRO, not because you don't know squat about embedded systems y2k problems, but because you toook a private e-mail obviously meant not to be posted on SI, and made it public.
Why should it not have been made public? Because what is said in private, among adults, is one thing. But children have access to this forum, and teachers have pointed out in the past that they use this thread for education purposes - and you take my e-mail, and publish it here - in toto? (You could have at least put it in the Clubhouse!) Not to mention the fact that you did not get my permission to do so! How low can you get?
To those on this thread who do not know me, since I've been silent here for months, for reasons that are my own, please accept my humblest apologies for the language you were subjected to. It was never my intention for the e-mail I sent to Mike Winn to be made public here. I hope you understand, and forgive me.
For those that do know me, I have said in the past that I will not return until TPRO is at $10, so forgive me for going back on my word but, I hope, you will understand that Mike's action cannot go unanswered.
Now, back to Mike:
"Could you explain to me what did I post on the SNDK thread that later on I had to backpedal? I thought you were trying to spam the TPRO stock on that thread and posted some idiotic posts about Sandisk getting into the Y2K remediation business and everybody on that thread pretty much ignored your idiotic posts. I was kind enough to explain to you that 1) Sandisk makes flash memory and has nothing to with embedded systems 2) you cannot replace a ROM or EPROM chip with a flash chip on a circuit board without a major redesign."
I think everyone can decide for themselves if the above statement by you is true or false:
Message 2664829
Message 2665913
Message 2666215
Message 2666484
Message 2667669
Message 2674652
Message 2690853
No further communication was received by me from SNDK regarding this subject.
"Actually you also spam TPRO on the MVIS thread and everybody pretty much ignored you."
Again, I think everyone can decide for themselves if the above statement by you is true or false:
Message 2919515
Message 2920746
Message 3098866
Message 3099026
"I think you're only good with quoting Shakespeare verses and post idotic stories about FBN, so I think you better stick with what you know best. It's better to keep your mouth shut and hide your ignorance than open it and remove all doubt, or something to that effect."
Humble thanks! Since, as you say, I am only good with quoting Shakespeare verses, etc., let me take this opportunity to quote the honorable Bard. I do believe he has a few lines that describe the likes of you:
King Lear
Act 2, Scene 2
KENT:
A knave; a rascal; an eater of broken meats; a
base, proud, shallow, beggarly, three-suited,
hundred-pound, filthy, worsted-stocking knave; a
lily-livered, action-taking knave, a whoreson,
glass-gazing, super-serviceable finical rogue;
one-trunk-inheriting slave; one that wouldst be a
bawd, in way of good service, and art nothing but
the composition of a knave, beggar, coward, pandar,
and the son and heir of a mongrel bitch: one whom I
will beat into clamorous whining, if thou deniest
the least syllable of thy addition.
I remain, humbly dreaming by the mail slot of the FBN mailroom, virtually near the first arch of the Mala Strana side of Charles Bridge, where they serve great hot rum, gratis for me, yours truly, ignoring Mike from now on,
Svejk
(GL-15 applies: digiserve.com ;-) |
