Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (1004175)	3/6/2017 9:58:37 AM
From: locogringo	3 Recommendations Recommended By FJB jlallen TideGlider Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574637

.the second one was drawn narrower and was granted.... By purposely "lying by omission". Wait until that is released. They drop Trump's name to get it approved, then still go after Trump. Not a very nice thing to do. The press will cover it up, but people (voters) will not be happy about that. BTW, did you see the new nickname for the perverted flag burner? It's perfect! Message 31016440

To: jlallen who wrote (1004175)	3/6/2017 12:06:17 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574637

The first request being turned down conflicts with the rubber stamp theme. Regardless, an approved warrant makes wire tapping legal. Hey, why was the Trump Tower - Russian bank server shut down Sept 23, the same day a story broke that law enforcement was looking at Carter Page's Russian connections? Some coincidence. If the first warrant request had been granted, the FBI could've tapped it while the link was still active. No wonder the wiretap produced no evidence of wrongdoing. They shut down communications before the wiretap was approved. If the secure server was innocent, bank business related ... why shut it down at all? Sorry, but shutting it down immediately when they realize the Feds are coming is suspicious.