SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1004250)3/6/2017 2:31:57 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575396
 
>> ECS is likely between 1.5°C and 4.5°C

And guess what? The 1.5°C was PREVIOUSLY 2.0°C.

I know, shit happens. But that's a pretty drop in what can be considered a "likely" outcome. Translation: "We don't know WTF it is."



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1004250)3/6/2017 6:54:38 PM
From: POKERSAM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575396
 
How do you know the pre-industrial level was 280?



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1004250)3/6/2017 7:03:03 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation

Recommended By
jlallen

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575396
 
>> We won't know exactly how much doubling CO2 will raise temperatures until after we double CO2.

No, and it is a significant argument. The presumed degree of linear fit for this statistic is yet another failure for the Warmists...



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1004250)3/6/2017 8:19:02 PM
From: Bonefish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575396
 
What's the most dangerous greenhouse gas? At your age I rest my case. LOL


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News