SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: elmatador who wrote (131741)3/8/2017 2:10:54 AM
From: Elroy Jetson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217596
 
Masayosh Son and Softbank are merely a front for Saudi Arabia and other investors from the Middle East. - wsj.com - nytimes.com

A lot of these deals are not who they purport to be and as you point out you often can tell who is truly buying who.



To: elmatador who wrote (131741)3/8/2017 3:01:23 AM
From: Snowshoe  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 217596
 
Chinese invented many things that were "copied" by others...

History of science and technology in China
en.wikipedia.org

Four Great Inventions
en.wikipedia.org

List of Chinese inventions
en.wikipedia.org

It took quite a long time for the West to reverse-engineer Chinese Porcelain...

European Porcelain
en.wikipedia.org



To: elmatador who wrote (131741)3/8/2017 3:37:32 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217596
 
Re <<As we know the Chinese always copy what someone did and worked>>

no, we do not know about that.

however you can expound on that pointless theme as i expect.

i do note that brazilians, and particularly brazilians who name themselves elmatador, cannot even copy. we also know what happens after copying, especially when engaged in by people who are of merit, and sporting suitably dimensioned brain chamber.

but, re copying, an interesting asymmetry is showing as a trend, that the chinese / english readers know what the english-only readers are working on, and not the other way around, and so therefore when folks announce some new geewhizbang, they discover an oops moment

do you know what tech geewhizbang i am referring to?

just noticed the linkedin link. as i do not do linkedin, so had no desire to spend time there. cafe more fun. you understand.



To: elmatador who wrote (131741)3/8/2017 5:41:38 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217596
 
re the <<asymmetry>> i noted Message 31020779 between chinese english-reading hackers and astute researchers vs english-only folks doing same same

if the asymmetry is valid for the via, goes 100X for small startups in high-cost locations

scmp.com

How do you frustrate a CIA hacker? Show them ChineseHow do you frustrate a CIA hacker? Show them Chinese.

In one of the 8,761 new documents released by WikiLeaks on Tuesday, which exposed the CIA’s global cyberespionage operations on an unprecedented scale, an agent on China missions lamented the language barrier.

“I do not speak Chinese,” he wrote in an internal post in 2014. The confidential documents and files released by WikiLeaks were said to have come from an isolated, high-security cyberattack facility operated by the CIA’s Centre for Cyber Intelligence in Langley, Virginia.

WikiLeaks had replaced the names of actual persons with code numbers.

A dialogue box in Chinese had kept popping up on screen as the agent tried to install a test program on a computer running the Windows operating system. Unable to understand what the box said, he tried everything from setting the system region to an English-speaking zone to forcing the program installer to use English.

The agent seemed to be experienced, having worked at the facility since 2009, according to a log of his or her activities in the WikiLeaks documents.

A Chinese-speaking CIA agent eventually translated the dialogue box for his frustrated English-speaking colleague.

CIA bypasses encryption of WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram and other messaging apps: Wikileaks

Tang Wei, a cybersecurity engineer and the marketing director of Beijing-based security company Rising, said these seemingly trivial antidotes in the WikiLeaks files might contain some valuable information.

“The American cyberwar machine has been operating under the hood and it is very difficult for an outsider to get a glimpse of what happens inside an operation centre. These documents revealed the tip of an iceberg,” he said.

The knowledge of how the CIA cyber units operate and the weaknesses and strengths of their agents will help other parties to come up with more effective defences or counter-attacks, according to Tang.

The language barrier, for instance, came as a surprise. The issue rarely entered the heads of cybersecurity experts because nearly all code lines are written in universal languages any programmer in the world can read.

But some Chinese software engineers have the habit of inserting Chinese text into source code to aid their memories and communicate with colleagues. This can cause unexpected obstacles for foreign attackers.

Wikileaks: CIA’s secret hacking toolkit turned iPhones and smart TVs into spy devices

Tang said the WikiLeaks document also confirmed the suspicion that the CIA and other US government agencies had recruited a number of Chinese-speaking hackers to assist in and accelerate China-related operations.

Rising, with clients in the Chinese industrial and government sectors, was part of a long list of companies targeted by CIA cyber operatives, according to the leaked files.

The files said the CIA had also developed many tools to infiltrate mobile phones, computers and even smart televisions running operating systems from Microsoft, Google, Apple and Samsung. Many of these had already been leaked and were circulating in ­global black markets, prompting proliferation concerns over global cybersecurity.

Weibo, a popular social media app developed by Chinese internet company Sina, might also be compromised, according to the WikiLeaks documents.




To: elmatador who wrote (131741)
3/8/2017 3:37:32 AM
From: TobagoJack Read Replies (1) of 131821
Re <<As we know the Chinese always copy what someone did and worked>>

no, we do not know about that.

however you can expound on that pointless theme as i expect.

i do note that brazilians, and particularly brazilians who name themselves elmatador, cannot even copy. we also know what happens after copying, especially when engaged in by people who are of merit, and sporting suitably dimensioned brain chamber.

but, re copying, an interesting asymmetry is showing as a trend, that the chinese / english readers know what the english-only readers are working on, and not the other way around, and so therefore when folks announce some new geewhizbang, they discover an oops moment

do you know what tech geewhizbang i am referring to?

just noticed the linkedin link. as i do not do linkedin, so had no desire to spend time there. cafe more fun. you understand.



To: elmatador who wrote (131741)3/10/2017 4:20:31 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217596
 
re copying, copied and wherever such black-cat/white-cat pragmatism leads to w/i the super-heated jungle that be 'china-lite' arena giving rise to players hard to discern and difficult to stop

an appreciation of history would go a long way to enable appreciation of whatever is actually happening as opposed to what either one likes to believe is happening or just copy out of articles written by folks who think they know is happening

best to talk to taxi drivers and dialogue w/ reflexologists to backstop multi-lingo internet and occasional 3d powwows

scmp.com

How China’s Airbnb copycats beat the Silicon Valley titan at its own gameOnline platforms such as Xiaozhu and Zhu Bai Jia are modifying the home-sharing culture for those still uneasy about having strangers in guestrooms

It’s hard to guess Zhou Yichang’s profession based on his description.

He visits Chinese families, surveying their living conditions and suggesting improvements. Sometimes he helps them find a handyman, or even paints their walls. Between visits, he answers their questions via a messaging app – as many as 60 requests a day.

But Zhou is not an interior designer or a social worker. He is a customer manager at Xiaozhu, a Chinese Airbnb-like home-sharing company.

“As many Chinese have never experienced home sharing, my job is to help them understand how to cater to guests and solve problems they have,” Zhou said. One family expecting a guest didn’t have a clean, dry bed sheet, so he brought them one.

Airbnb was founded in San Francisco in 2008, but did not set up a China office until less than a year ago – by which time scores of Chinese firms had already copied its business model. Largely unknown outside China, these businesses have attracted hundreds of millions of dollars in investment and earned the loyalty of many Chinese travellers. Xiaozhu claims about 10 million active users since it went online in 2012.



Chen Chi, founder and CEO of xiaozhu.com, a platform for people to rent their homes to travellers in China. Photo: Simon Song

While these companies borrowed Airbnb’s template, they also innovated, introducing services that Airbnb would later mirror.

Zhu Bai Jia, a Shenzhen-based start-up founded in 2012, focuses on providing outbound Chinese tourists with short-term home rentals in some 70 countries. Besides assisting travellers looking for a home away from home, Zhu Bai Jia helps them plan entire trips, using hosts that also serve as part-time tour guides. Airbnb launched a similar service only last year.

“When Airbnb launched ‘Airbnb Trips’ last year, we laughed,” Li Le, the spokesperson of Zhu Bai Jia, told This Week in Asia. “The joke in our sector is that ‘China used to copy Silicon Valley, but now it is Silicon Valley that copies China.’”



The site of home-sharing giant Airbnb. It’s operations have attracted more than a million guest arrivals in China. Photo: AFP

Innovations are even more vital in the domestic market. “If you just try to take the pure Airbnb model to China, it would never work,” said Raymond Chang, who teaches entrepreneurship at the graduate business school of Yale University.

He explains that in America, the custom of opening one’s home to travellers has been engrained since colonial days, but such traditions don’t exist in China. “There are a lot of social barriers that have to be overcome,” Chang said.

Home market the focus for Xiaozhu, the Airbnb of ChinaThe founder of Xiaozhu, Chen Chi, learnt the ins and outs of home-sharing by stepping into the shoes of his hosts, sharing his own home in Beijing since 2013. He found it was often a chore to deliver keys to guests in-person during working hours, so his company began to subsidise the installation of smart locks that allow guests to open doors on their own with a one-time code.



A view of the working space of Xiaozhu in Beijing. The company is a home-sharing service, offering an online platform for people to rent their homes to travellers in China. Photo: Simon Song

Xiaozhu has also trained part-time cleaning ladies and linked them with hosts – a service that Airbnb does not provide.

Host Vicky Tang made use of the free advice that Xiaozhu provides, meeting a manager at her home in Shenzhen.

Chinese Airbnb clone Xiaozhu valued at US$300m as investors tap China’s ‘sharing economy’“Your place looks really good,” the manager said while walking around her flat decorated with green ivy, colourful cushions, and IKEA paintings. “But your bed sheet looks a bit old,” he stopped and said. “Will you consider buying a new one?”

“Having a good night’s sleep is essential for bed-and-breakfast services,” the manager explained. “Even though guests can’t see the difference in photos. They will feel it when they sleep here.”

Tang, 23, is a first-time host and eager to attract guests to help ease the financial pressures of living in a city with soaring rents. “This training is really helpful,” she said. “In the beginning, I didn’t bother to write much [on the site] about myself , but now I know if I add more details – say, I learnt Korean in school – it will help people get to know me and attract like-minded guests.”



A property listing on the Airbnb website. Photo; Moneypost

Her training session lasted an hour, with discussions ranging from who should pay utility bills to how to politely turn down a booking request. Then Tang asked the same question almost every Xiaozhu user asks: “How do I know if this guy is trustworthy?”

To remove barriers to trust, Xiaozhu encourages users to connect their accounts with Sesame Credit, a social credit scoring system developed by an affiliate of China’s Alibaba Group that rates an individual’s credibility using big data. Alibaba is the owner of the South China Morning Post.

Beijing, Hong Kong and Taipei landlords’ returns on investment from rent or Airbnb lets are lowest in the world, survey findsAirbnb declined to comment on its Chinese copycats, but said it has been ramping up efforts to make its service appealing to users in China. Sean Pan, the head of operations for Airbnb China, said it had reached almost a million guest arrivals in China.

Airbnb guests can now pay via Alipay and sign up through WeChat. Yet it is unclear whether Airbnb, one of the world’s biggest accommodation companies valued at US$30 billion, can compete with its copycats in China.

“Which company is doing better in China?” It’s very hard to tell,” said Jesper Palmqvist, the Asia Pacific director of STR, a market intelligence company which researches the global lodging industry.

“Some people have tried to do the parallel between how it’s played out with Uber and Didi Chuxing, but personally I think it would seem [too] early to compare that in any way,” he said.

Some argue Airbnb and its Chinese copycats don’t have to enter a fierce competition, at least not for now. “China’s home-sharing market is still in its infant stage. We should work together to compete with hotels, rather than fighting against each other,” Xiaozhu’s founder Chen said.



A Chinese national flag flutters in front of an apartment tower in Shenzhen. Photo: Reuters

For Zhou, the Xiaozhu customer manager, Airbnb and Xiaozhu already share premium space on his smartphone.

The 25-year-old rents a four-bedroom apartment in Shenzhen, and lists three rooms on both Xiaozhu and Airbnb. Zhou said his room-letting covered his rent for the whole year and then some.

When asked which platform helped him most, he chose Xiaozhu. Airbnb’s chief Chinese rival keeps his phone buzzing with orders.

“Xiaozhu brings me more business, while my last order from Airbnb was almost one month ago,” Zhou said, pausing for a second before carrying on. “I’m not trying to bad-mouth our competitor,” he added with a sheepish smile. ¦



To: elmatador who wrote (131741)3/15/2017 6:01:56 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217596
 
re <<copy>>

china admits copying scmp.com

China steams ahead in carrier-based jet launch and recovery tech, PLA admiral says

PUBLISHED : Wednesday, 15 March, 2017, 11:40pm
UPDATED : Thursday, 16 March, 2017, 1:02am



China’s systems to launch and catch carrier-based aircraft are more advanced than those ­designed for the new generation of US supercarriers, according to a ­Chinese expert in the technology.

Rear Admiral Ma Weiming, a top engineer working on the project, said on the sidelines of the National People’s Congress on Monday that China had made breakthroughs in its advanced ­arresting gear (AAG) system designed to retrieve aircraft at sea, while the US had stumbled.

“The Gerald Ford cancelled its AAG and reverted to its original [arresting wire] system. We have no such problem,” he said, referring to the US’ new class of aircraft carrier.

He also said China’s electromagnetic aircraft launch system (EMALS) was more advanced than comparable US technology.

“We have long overcome [all technical difficulties in EMALS]. I have ­already moved on from this [area of research and development],” he said.

Saying he was just a scientific researcher, Ma declined to say when his advanced technologies would be installed on China’s homegrown carriers.



Ma’s remarks come as China moves ahead with its carrier construction programme. Its first domestically built aircraft carrier, the Type 001A, is nearing completion and is expected to be launched in the first half of this year.

Construction of the second one, Type 002, is also under way.

An earlier report by the South China Morning Post said China would not adopt the highly ­advanced EMALS technology on the Type 002 but instead rely on a conventional system.

Beijing-based naval expert Li Jie said Ma had made “a certain advances” in AAG technology, compared with the US.

Macau-based military observer Antony Wong Dong said the US AAG engineers had underestimated the difficulty of developing the technology and China may have been able to take note of this to make progress.

“Ma’s team .... may have learned lessons from their US counterparts, and made some breakthrough on AAG development,” Wong said.



To: elmatador who wrote (131741)3/16/2017 1:21:56 AM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
bart13

  Respond to of 217596
 
re <<copy>>

... road markers coming up

ft.com

China poised to top global corporate patentsApplications surge 45% to challenge lead of US and Japan in international filings

© BloombergChinese patenting applications surged 45 per cent in 2016, according to the World Intellectual Property Organisation, putting the country on track to overtake Japan and the US to become the largest user of the international patent system within two years.

ZTE and Huawei, two of China’s largest telecoms and electronics companies, topped the 2016 rankings for corporate patenting compiled by the Geneva-based UN agency.

“China-based filers are behind much of the growth in international patent and trademark filings?.?.?.?as the country continues its journey from ‘Made in China’ to ‘Created in China’,” said Francis Gurry, Wipo director-general.

Wipo’s analysis covers international applications through the patent co-operation treaty, which tend to be of higher quality than purely domestic filings. If trends continue, China will move ahead of Japan this year and the US within two years to become the leader in the international patent system.

Chinese inventors made 43,000 international applications in 2016, while domestic filings make China’s patent office much the busiest in the world, handling more than 1m applications a year.



Since Huawei and ZTE started filing international patents in 2000 and 2002 respectively, their applications have risen quickly to take them comfortably to the top two positions in the global patenting table.

“The two Chinese companies are still in a big catch-up race with competitors elsewhere in the world,” said Frank Tietze of Cambridge university’s Centre for Technology Management. “They are filing, filing, filing to build up a big patent portfolio that they can use as a bargaining chip when negotiating with other companies.”

Japan and South Korea have also increased their international patent applications more rapidly than most European and North American companies, though not at the same pace as China. As a result, Asia accounted for 47.4 per cent of all applications last year, just short of the combined share of Europe (25.6 per cent) and North America (25.3 per cent).

“Japanese domestic filings have been declining for eight or nine years while international filings continue to grow strongly,” said Mr Gurry. “There is a clear strategy in Japan to concentrate on patenting and exploiting the best inventions as widely as possible.”



The US share of global patent activity has been falling since 2000, when it was 34 per cent of the total. Mr Gurry does not expect Donald Trump’s election to affect American intellectual property policy or practice.

“You might say that President Trump represents the old economy of real estate, manufacturing and energy but the US remains very science and technology oriented,” he said. “I would be surprised to see big changes, even with increasing protectionism.”

Among large industrialised countries Canada has experienced the largest declines in patenting in recent years. Wipo linked this to the woes of two of the largest Canadian technology companies, with Nortel in liquidation following bankruptcy in 2009 and Research In Motion / BlackBerry making big cuts in research and development.



To: elmatador who wrote (131741)3/27/2017 5:08:26 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217596
 
china should soon be exporting workers to brazil, as a globalisation by-the-way, while manufacturing lots of workers for china

china shall likely soon export workers to america

valuewalk.com

China’s Rise in Global Robotics: Toward Consolidation

By Dan Steinbock on March 26, 2017 10:16 pm in Technology

Why China is on the rise in Automation, Global Robotics, Industrial Robots – Industry Leaders

Chinese robotics is positioned for leadership in global robotics, as the emerging industry is moving toward increasing rivalry and consolidation.

In the new and emerging industry, the rise of innovative robotics startups heralds the future. In 2016, almost 130 companies were funded by venture capital, including China-based RooBo, Israeli Roboteam, and German ReActive Robotics. While the most valuable deals involved unmanned aerial systems companies (read: drones), they were followed by agricultural robotics, service robots for businesses and personal use.

The total amounted to almost $2 billion; over 50 percent more than in 2015 – itself a record year.

Emerging high-growth industry

As emerging industries diffuse to mass markets, innovative startups typically become acquisition targets by major corporations that seek to consolidate the rapidly-growing industry. Last year was a milestone for such acquisitions in robotics and automation with 50 companies sold for more than $19 billion.

The top five transactions totaled more than $1 billion each, including German KUKA, which was bought by Chinese Midea; the Luxembourg-based Dematic (German Kion Group); and the US-based Intelligrated (American Honeywell).

Aiming at leadership, KUKA is pausing its acquisition spree to absorb new businesses. As a winning German company, it was known for reliability. As a winning Chinese company in global markets, it must achieve lower costs.

As evidenced by the boom of innovative startups, venture capital funding and industry acquisitions, global robotics is the new technology frontier.

Past investments by Chinese industry leaders, central and local government agencies and universities are paying off. In 2016, industrial robots beat all other categories in terms of output growth – integrated circuits, motor vehicles and mobile telephones – expanding by more than 30 percent.

Rising global rivalry

Until recently, Chinese industrial robots were still relatively simple compared to such players as Japan’s Fanuc or Switzerland’s ABB. Two of three industrial robots that were purchased by Chinese factories from abroad, and most Chinese companies depended on imported foreign components.

Today, China is rebalancing from a low-cost ‘world factory’ to a world-class advanced-manufacturing power, which is precipitated by new technology-related initiatives, including Strategic Emerging Industries (SEI), Sci-Tech Innovation 2030, Internet Plus, and Made in China 2025. At the same time, Chinese industry leaders are moving from low prices to world-class innovation.

But market leadership will not come without competitive friction. And as global robotics is approaching consolidating phase, rivalries are about to become tougher.

In 2015, worldwide sales of industrial robots soared to 254,000 units. Almost two of three were sold in Asia; nearly half of these in China, and the rest elsewhere in Asia and Australia. In professional service robots, sales value rose to $4.6 billion; in personal service robots to $2.2 billion.

In global robotics, the key rivals feature the US, Japan (and to a degree, Korea), Europe and China. The US is most capital-intensive. Japan stresses innovation. Western Europe exemplifies greatest intensity (high ratio of robots per population).

Nevertheless, as the largest growth market, China is moving toward production leadership. US dominance in the automotive industry is no longer immune to competition, as evidenced by the 2016 purchase of US-based Paslin by Zhejiang Wanfeng, a subsidiary of a Chinese car parts supplier. The KUKA acquisition is boosting Midea in rivalry with Japanese innovation.

In 2015, markets were dominated by European and North America (80%), as against Asia (20%). Yet, the uptake of industrial robots in is accelerating regionally. In the first half of the 2010s, the annual supply of industrial robots rose by 70 percent in Asia/Australia. In 2015, China’s robot density was ranked only 28th in the world, but it is targeted to more than quadruple by 2020, as Chinese industry leaders said in the recent robotics summit in Shanghai.

Regional rivalries

Moreover, the regional strengths of incumbent robotics leaders are eroding, due to international uncertainty and the new US protectionism. Despite slow recovery, impending European elections suggest that regional disintegration remains a risk and complicates industry leaders’ efforts to achieve scale and scope in the region.

While three of four units in the NAFTA area (US, Canada, Mexico) are sold in America, the White House’s new protectionism has potential to undermine the very market US multinationals rely on for their leadership, as well as their sales in growth markets, such as China. Due to its deepening stagnation, Japan needs solid external growth, which was expected from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) that the US exited in January.

Conversely, China’s large-scale capital markets are still in their early phase and have a lot of room to grow, unlike in the US. The same goes for Chinese robotics density, unlike in Europe. Relative to Japan, China continues to grow 4-5 times faster. And while Washington is pushing for new barriers, Beijing is pushing for new globalization and regional growth (One Road One Belt Initiative), both of which will facilitate rapid rise of new industries.

Indeed, the fundamentals of the emerging industry and economic realities are supporting the rise of Chinese robotics in a way that is no longer possible for other major industry players.