SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alex MG who wrote (41369)3/9/2017 4:31:43 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42652
 
“Who takes less ?”

I think that's the wrong question. He's looking at this as zero sum and it isn't. That's a common mental block.

This will be single payer (yes i know its a dirty phrase in this country) for chronic physical or mental illness and for any life threatening injury.

That's a pretty klugy presentation but it looks like what he's talking about is a variation ongovernment-funded high-risk pools. That's similar in principle to what we have now in the tax system where medical costs over a certain amount are tax deductible. We've discussed similar ideas on this thread before, way back when. He would make the deduction a credit and base it not on costs but on type of treatment. Insurance companies or individuals handle the small stuff and the government underwrites the big stuff. I think the idea is worth further examination.