SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A Hard Look At Donald Trump -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (8226)3/13/2017 7:58:25 PM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 46554
 
Say NO To Trumpcare


by MICK STATON 0 0

After years of promises and eleventy-billion votes in the House to fully repeal Obamacare the Republicans finally have the chance to do it FOR REAL this time, and what are they doing? They are putting forward a plan that is actually worse than Obamacare.

The new health care plan written by the establishment and supported by the President will destroy the health insurance industry and make the Republican party own an even worse disaster than Obamacare. It keeps the worst parts of Obamacare and substitutes one new entitlement with a different new entitlement (except this time they call it a “refundable tax credit”).

Republican lawmakers have lost their spines. They have been showing up to Town Hall meetings and getting inundated with astro-turfed protesters demanding that they keep Obamacare. They seem more concerned with trying to make people happy than doing their jobs, and as a result they are proposing really bad policy. If this bill passes it will be a disaster for our party.

We need to do everything we can to remind our elected leaders of the promise they made to us over, and over, and over again. Call your Representative and Senators. For that matter contact EVERY REPUBLICAN IN CONGRESS. Tell them that you want a full repeal of Obamacare. Tell them to vote against anything but a full repeal, nothing more, nothing less.

Here are three major points you can make about how bad this bill is:

1 It accelerates the death spiral by keeping the pre-existing condition mandate.

While we all hate the mandate from the government to buy health insurance, it was put into Obamacare for a reason. Health insurance companies are a business. They are able to stay in business because they use the premiums paid by healthy people who don’t use their insurance in order to offset the costs of the sick people who need it. The incentive healthy people have to buy insurance is to make sure they are covered in case they get sick.

By mandating health insurance companies cover pre-existing conditions, you take away the incentive for healthy people to buy insurance. Why would you waste thousands of dollars a year for a product you don’t use, especially when you can just run out and buy a policy as soon as you are sick, and drop it once you are well again? It’s like waiting to buy homeowners insurance until after your house burns down. That’s where the mandate to buy insurance came from. Trumpcare, however, makes things worse. It does away with the mandate to buy health insurance, but it keeps the requirement to cover pre-existing conditions.

With no incentive or mandate to be insured, healthy people won’t buy insurance. This leads to the “death spiral” where insurance companies have to pay out more money in claims than they receive in premiums. The CEO of AETNA believes the death spiral has already begun under Obamacare because people are choosing to pay the penalty instead of buying insurance. If Trumpcare passes, this death spiral will be accelerated. If that happens we won’t have to worry about health insurance costs, because in about 10 years there won’t be any health insurance companies left in business.

2 It keeps all the existing Obamacare regulations and does NOTHING to cut health care costs.

As I mentioned in my last post on this subject, we need to STOP trying to micro-manage the health insurance industry and START working to bring down health care COSTS. Trumpcare does not do any of that. It keeps all of the regulations created by Obamacare and does nothing to start controlling costs. This is the same thing as managing the symptoms without ever trying to cure the disease.

Instead of moving people off government health care systems (Medicare and Medicaid), it protects and extends the Medicaid expansion brought on by Obamacare. The added federal money keeps flowing for years, and then anyone who is receiving Medicaid services will be grandfathered in. Putting more and more people on the federal dole does nothing to cut costs. It simply makes health care coverage more expensive because the government is now having to cover more and more people. This means the per capita amount they are able to reimburse health care providers will shrink and shrink. Those costs are passed on by the health care providers to the people that pay for their own insurance. Namely you and me.

3 Don’t try to sell us the “three phases of healthcare” line. We all know there will only be one phase.

The current line coming from the establishment and the White House is to just be patient. They are doing things in “phases” and the really good things are coming in phases 2 and 3. Well, that just won’t happen. The limitation we are facing right now is what can be done under a reconciliation process. A budget reconciliation bill cannot be filibustered which means we only need 50 votes in the Senate to pass it. The catch is that anything that happens in a reconciliation bill must be “budget related.” There are a lot of reforms we all would like to see happen that just can’t happen under a reconciliation process, because we are limited to rules and regulations that have a budgetary impact. Anything else that we want done will have to come through the regular process, which means it can be filibustered.

What that means is that there will be no phases 2 and 3. Any bills designed to replace the remaining parts of Obamacare will be filibustered by Democrats in the Senate and will go nowhere. Mitch McConnell will make a half-hearted effort to pass a so-called “phase 2” through the Senate, but will throw up his hands when the Democrats filibuster it, and nothing else will be passed.

This will be the only chance we have to repeal Obamacare, and the Senate Parliamentarian has already ruled that a straight out, nearly full repeal of Obamacare CAN BE DONE via reconciliation. Here is from an op-ed by Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) on how we can do things right:

In 2015, Congress passed language on reconciliation repealing most of Obamacare. Virtually every Republican in Congress voted for that language, and the parliamentarian has already ruled it as permissible. We should begin with that previously approved repeal language as the baseline.

Second, repeal the insurance regulations as well. In 2015, these coverage mandates of Obamacare were excluded from the repeal language. The parliamentarian never ruled on whether including them would be permissible on reconciliation. But we’ve got to repeal those mandates. Why? The single biggest factor driving popular dissatisfaction with Obamacare is skyrocketing premiums. And the insurance mandates are the biggest factor driving those premiums. If we “repeal” Obamacare, and leave the insurance mandates in place, the premiums paid by families will remain sky-high. And that’s unacceptable—voters would rightly deem repeal a farce if we don’t actually drive premiums down to where they’re affordable again.

Can we get the mandates repealed on reconciliation? The answer is yes: The mandates are driving up federal expenditures by billions, and so should properly be deemed budgetary in nature. But if the parliamentarian disagrees, the vice president has the statutory and constitutional authority (as does the Senate majority) to rule to the contrary. And that’s exactly what should happen, if necessary.

We need to cut Obamacare out root and branch. It is bad policy, period. We can’t keep any of it just because a Republican is now proposing it. A bad idea is a bad idea, no matter where it comes from.

Once that is done we can work on small, stand-alone reform issues that make a lot of sense and will be very hard for Democrats up for re-election in red states to vote against. Let President Trump use his power and his rallies in states like West Virginia, Missouri, and Montana, daring Democrat Senators like Joe Manchin (D-WV), Claire McCaskill (D-MO), and John Tester (D-MT) to vote against Tort reform, or reforming the FDA approval process, or any number of popular reform ideas that will cut health care costs and start solving the problem.

We’re going to get just one chance at this. We have to do it right. Act now, before your Congressman caves to the pressure to just “do something,” and gives us something worse than what we have.

thenewamericana.com



To: Brumar89 who wrote (8226)3/13/2017 8:18:09 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 46554
 
Kushners Set to Get $400 Million From Chinese Firm on Tower

by
David Kocieniewski
and
Caleb Melby

March 13, 2017, 10:57 AM CDT March 13, 2017, 12:44 PM CDT

[ This smells like an influence peddling deal between the Trump/Kushners and China. Not to mention Steve Roth, who has bailed out the Kushner family in the past and who they owe $1.1B to due in 2019 and who is going to manage the trillion dollar infrastructure project, gets paid off too. Talk about corruption. Monteizing the Presidency is job one. ]


Family company of president’s son-in-law in deal with Anbang (Son of a former Chinese leader)

Plan is circulating among investors for more equity partners

A company owned by the family of Jared Kushner, President Donald Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser, stands to receive more than $400 million from a prominent Chinese company that is investing in the Kushners’ marquee Manhattan office tower at 666 Fifth Ave.

The planned $4-billion transaction includes terms that some real estate experts consider unusually favorable for the Kushners. It provides them with both a sizable cash payout from Anbang Insurance Group for a property that has struggled financially and an equity stake in a new partnership.



666 Fifth Ave.

Photographer: Daniel Acker/Bloomberg

The details of the agreement, which is being circulated to attract additional investors, were shared with Bloomberg. It would make business partners of Kushner Cos. and Anbang, whose murky links to the Chinese power structure have raised national security concerns over its U.S. investments. In the process, an existing mortgage owed by the Kushners will be slashed to about a fifth of its current amount.

The document offers a rare look at a major deal by a close Trump associate and family member. It’s unclear whether the deal could prompt federal review, as occurred when Anbang bought other properties, like the Waldorf Astoria Hotel in Manhattan. Anbang could also face review by the Chinese government, which has been clamping down on overseas investments and which has a range of pending issues with the Trump administration.

Controversial Visa Program The proposed partnership is seeking additional participants through a controversial federal program known as EB-5, which is intended for economically distressed neighborhoods and provides residency permits to major foreign investors.

The deal would value the 41-story tower at $2.85 billion, the most ever for a single Manhattan building: $1.6 billion for the office section and $1.25 billion for the retail section. The new partnership will refinance $1.15 billion in existing mortgage debt.

"This is a huge, huge exit strategy for an office building," said Joshua Stein, a New York real estate lawyer. "It does sound like a home run of a transaction for Kushner and his group.”

Scott A. Singer, president of the Singer & Bassuk Organization, said the terms struck him as “aggressive but not absurd,” based on the net income and square footage metrics he was shown by Bloomberg. He said they were along the lines of what might be expected for a trophy asset at a prime location.

Conflict of Interest? Kushner Cos. declined to discuss details of the plan or name the potential lenders or investors it is courting, saying the deal is not finalized. A company spokesman, James Yolles, said that Jared Kushner sold his ownership stake in 666 Fifth to family members so the transaction poses no conflict of interest with his White House role.

“Kushner Companies has taken significant steps to avoid potential conflicts and will continue to do so," Yolles said in a written statement.

Asked for comment, a White House spokeswoman said Kushner will recuse himself from any matter where his impartiality could be reasonably questioned, including an examination of the EB-5 program.

Some government ethics experts argue that the Kushner family and business are so close-knit that the steps Jared Kushner has taken do not go far enough. Also at issue: as-of-yet undisclosed lenders who are financing the project and the forgiveness of a portion of a $250 million loan which will allow the debt to be cleared for one-fifth of its value.

‘Sweetheart Deal’"At the very least, this raises serious questions about the appearance of a conflict that arises from the possibility that the Kushners are getting a sweetheart deal," said Larry Noble, general counsel at the Campaign Legal Center. "A classic way you influence people is by financially helping their family."

The transaction would allow the Kushner Cos.’ investment in the tower to be salvaged by lenders and businesses that could have extensive dealings with the federal government, while also permitting the Kushners to buy back into the building’s more lucrative retail spaces and maintain a 20 percent stake.

The deal would allow Vornado Realty Trust -- which is partnered with Trump in his two most valuable properties -- to exit a troubled asset with a 10-fold payout on its stake in the building’s offices and a doubling of its investment in its stores. It declined to discuss the deal.

Steven Roth, chairman of Vornado, co-chairs a committee dedicated to one of the new administration’s signature campaign pledges: infrastructure investment. Vornado is the biggest property owner in the area surrounding Manhattan’s Pennsylvania Station and could benefit from increased infrastructure spending.

Fears of Espionage Anbang would pay a hefty price for both sections of the 666 Fifth Ave. project but score its first U.S. real estate investment of the year. The company’s ties to the Chinese government are sufficiently unclear that former President Barack Obama declined to stay at the Waldorf after Anbang bought it because of fears of espionage. Now Anbang will be business partners with in-laws of the First Family.

An outside spokesman for Anbang, Tim Ragones, declined to comment on the deal terms but denied that the company’s ownership structure is unclear. “Anbang is a highly transparent company that operates in accordance to the standards of public companies and strictly abides by applicable regulatory requirements,” he said.

Kushner, who is married to Trump’s daughter Ivanka, has become something of a de facto envoy for the administration, and was present for a meeting between Yang Jiechi, China’s top diplomat, and his father-in-law at the end of February. As one of the president’s closest advisers, he could have input on a wide range of issues affecting China, from national security concerns and territorial disputes to trade matters and allegations of currency manipulation. There are discussions under way between China and the U.S. on a potential summit between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping to take place as early as next month.

The refinancing agreement is the latest twist in the history of a building that was Jared Kushner’s grandest conquest and nearly proved his downfall. In 2007, he purchased the tower for a then-record $1.8 billion. It was a move that signaled the company’s intention to expand beyond its extensive holdings in suburban garden apartments to more prestigious urban properties. Then the financial crisis hit. Four years later, with the investment teetering near insolvency, Vornado swooped in, getting a 49.5 percent stake in exchange for an $80 million capital injection. It then took on more of the tower in 2012, purchasing the retail spaces at the building’s base from Kushner and others for $707 million.

‘Hope Note’ An unusual consideration in the refinancing plan is the proposal to pay off a part of the mortgage known as a "hope note," which was for $115 million when Kushner Cos refinanced its debt in 2011. The loan, which was made by Barclays Plc and has since been sold off to investors, is now valued at more than $250 million because of compounded interest. But according to the deal documents, the Kushners will settle the debt for just $50 million. The Kushners declined to discuss the agreement. LNR Partners LLC, which currently oversees the debt, declined to comment.

Anbang will pay for most of the building and take out a construction loan of more than $4 billion to convert the property’s higher floors into luxury residential units. The Kushners have agreed to invest $750 million in the retail portion of the building and will end up with a one-fifth stake in a project that the deal document says would be valued at $7.2 billion when completed. In addition to the $400 million from Anbang, the Kushners will receive another $100 million from other investors.

The plan also relies on the government program known as EB-5, which grants two-year visas and a path to permanent residency to foreigners who invest a minimum of $500,000 in projects that create jobs in economically distressed areas.

Lax Vetting? Supporters argue that the program, which is overwhelmingly used on deals involving Chinese investors, attracts foreign capital and creates jobs at no U.S. taxpayer cost. But some Homeland Security officials and the General Accounting Office have warned that lax vetting has threatened to turn the program into a mechanism for the government to sell visas to wealthy foreigners with no proven skills, paving the way for money laundering and compromising national security.

It has been used to finance high-profile developments in wealthy enclaves, however, including Brooklyn’s Barclays Center and Hudson Yards. The deal for 666 Fifth Avenue, on one of the world’s most expensive shopping strips, blocks from Trump Tower, would arguably be the toniest location for an EB-5 project yet. The $850 million in EB-5 funding sought in the refinancing plan for 666 Fifth Avenue would be the largest to date.

Congress is now considering whether to renew the program and adopt new restrictions to deter the misuse of the program. The White House will ultimately be involved in that decision

bloomberg.com