Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (132071)	3/14/2017 4:10:30 PM
From: bart13	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217653

Total manufacturing employees peaked in 1979 in the high 19 million range, with output per worker in 2005 dollars at just under $100,000 Total manufacturing employees in 2013 was around 12 million (minus 7 million, over a 1/3 drop). with output per worker over $305,000 (tripled) in 2005 dollars. Productivity gains w/o robots was huge!

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (132071)	3/15/2017 4:25:29 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217653

This development explains the low participation rate constant growth in productivity and the low inflation. The present administration does not get it and a very different compensation structure must be established. One example a worker that is unemployed and wants to engage in skills improvements and participate in one of the special skills courses should receive a 80% salary as if he works in his previous job. This is floating only one idea, of course there needed to be checks and balances. Retirement age should be more flexible similar to that practiced in Russia depending on the type of employment. Of course government employees should be excluded and continue as it is. Income from new acquired advanced jobs should be tax free after retirement.