Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Katelew who wrote (41496)	3/18/2017 5:46:52 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42652

The CBO position that cost-sharing would 'tend to be higher' or the writer's position that "average total costs...would be significantly higher. Could easily be both. or offering their own ideas for bringing down costs, bringing more insurers into the program, and bringing more healthy younger uninsured into the program. I have often heard it said that the D's see flaws that they want to fix. I haven't seen specifics. Might be interesting and useful to know what they are. It seems to me that the default is now Obamacare and any change requires strong justification that warrants charging once more into the breach and incur further uncertainty and disruption. I have not yet seen that case made, not in this first piece of the puzzle.