Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1007403)	3/23/2017 12:52:51 AM
From: i-node	3 Recommendations Recommended By jlallen locogringo one_less Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573434

Here's the problem with Schiff. He has yet to produce one SHRED of evidence. No physical evidence. Not one name of a character outside of the Trump administration, a Russian, or whatever. He has no proof at all. It appears, at this point, that he's just trying to stir something up, based on nothingness. As long as idiots continue to suck this down, he'll spew it. But sooner or later he is going to be called on to prove it, and he obviously cannot prove that anything happened when nothing did. They're trying smear Trump with a guy who worked for his campaign for a total of about 4 months before being abruptly fired when it became known he had some connection with Russia. None related to Trump, of course. This is just the Democrats being puffed up sore losers. And they'll keep going as long as there are stupid leftwingers. Which could be a very long time, I'll agree.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1007403)	3/23/2017 1:35:23 AM
From: Bonefish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573434

Hillary lost. Good.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1007403)	3/23/2017 11:33:18 AM
From: locogringo	4 Recommendations Recommended By FJB Honey_Bee jlallen POKERSAM Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573434

Schiff: 'More Than Circumstantial Evidence' Trump Associates Colluded With Russia FAKE headline above. FACT: "I don't want to get into specifics but I will say that there is evidence that is not circumstantial and is very much worthy of an investigation." "worthy of investigation"= we don't know shit but we should keep looking. If he had FACTS, he would spit them out in a flash, just like Nunes did.