Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Habib who wrote (7222)	1/6/1998 1:19:00 PM
From: GS_Wall Street	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 213173

Yeah, No one on the street has the balls to recomend Apple ahead of earnings even if they think they will be good. The heard mentallity prevails. After earnings they will recomend this stock when it is in the low to mid 20's. Saying it is worth 30 or so.

To: Richard Habib who wrote (7222)	1/6/1998 1:20:00 PM
From: Marc Newman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 213173

A quick trip back down to 15, but bounced off that. I ended up buying back most of my position at 15 5/16. The Oracle news is good, very good. The Microsoft news will get press too. I hope Mac the Knife was correct about Apple returning big quantities of unused 603 and 604 chips. And 14% of cpu sales per CompUSA with the improved Apple section, that's hot. Marc

To: Richard Habib who wrote (7222)	1/6/1998 1:23:00 PM
From: Eric Yang	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 213173

The two commentators (Tim from Creative Strategies & James something from Dataquest) made the non-G3 sales sound really bad. Tim said that the sales of none G3s have gone to zero since G3's introduction. BS.. He also said that Apple should price none G3 machines in the $1000 range to compete with Wintels. He's comparing PowerMacs which are 2X as powerful to $799 PCs! Lower the priced on 6500 maybe but I don't agree that the 8600s should be priced below $2000. Eric