SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bw who wrote (6725)1/6/1998 2:02:00 PM
From: Teddy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
 
Something to read while we waite. One of the reasons why drilling continues even as crude prices have pulled back.

"FOURTH DIMENSION" ADDED TO HUNT FOR OIL.

By Sean Maguire

LONDON - New seismic techniques, which
add time as a fresh dimension, are paying off
for companies trying to squeeze oil out of
ageing North Sea fields.

Norwegian oil producers have begun to rely on
the fledgling science, which compares
seismic surveys taken at different stages in a
oilfield's lifetime to help spot pockets of
hydrocarbons missed by the drilling teams.

The development of seismic in four
dimensions (4D) -- depth, width and length,
plus time -- has helped Norway's state-owned
Statoil to raise its forecast for oil recovery from
the Gullfaks field by nine percent to 62
percent.

That is a profitable extra 330 million barrels of
oil.

The global 4D market will top $500 million this
year, an increasing slice of the total annual
spend on seismic, for exploration and other
purposes, of around $1.5-$2 billion, says
Oslo-headquartered Petroleum Geo-Services.

Take-up will be quickest in the North Sea and
the Gulf of Mexico with rapid growth in 4D
expected by 2000.

High recovery rates have helped ease oil
industry worries that the benefits of 4D were
not worth the cost.

The technology had developed slowly because
of doubts about the compatability of surveys
performed years apart, problems with
analysing mountains of data and the
interdisciplinary challenge it represents to oil
companies.

"Its got to the point that there are enough
promising pilot results around for there to be
quite widespread interest," said Bob Seymour,
4D manager at seismic giant Western
Geophysical.

"If it works it is extremely attractive
economically," said Seymour. Clients
convinced of the method expect to improve oil
recovery by 10 percent at a marginal cost.

Most oil industry seismic studies are still
"shot" by boats trailing long lines of
hydrophone arrays which record sound waves,
generated by a compressed air gun, that are
reflected back by rocks deep beneath the
ocean floor.

Companies are also testing Ocean Bottom
Cable (OBC) systems, which can measure
"shear" (transverse) waves as well as just
pressure waves from sound.

In simple "pressure" form OBC systems were
originally used in areas cluttered with
platforms and pipelines.

Now the dual OBC systems are promoted as
offering clearer resolution of complex sub-sea
faults. However, the technology lags behind
4D techniques in general acceptance.

Both systems are attractive to oil companies
because they help in understanding how
efficiently water or gas pumped into an oil
reservoir flushes crude towards up-wells.

Lessons from pioneering 4D work by Norsk
Hydro on the Oseberg field in 1989 and 1991
will be used on the complex Njord field, which
is due on stream in September.

Norsk Hydro hopes to improve recovery from
30 to 36 percent to produce an extra 40
million barrels of oil.

A pilot 4D seismic project on part of Gullfaks
in 1995 helped Statoil so far to spot three new
drilling targets.

One well is producing 6,300 barrels of oil a
day, from an area the company's model of the
reservoir predicted would be empty, and the
two other targets should yield oil this week.

"Dissatisfaction with reservoir modelling and
drainage simulation has driven the need for 4D
seismic mapping," said Statoil's Lars Magnus
Pedersen. "Previously we had just guesses of
what was going on in the sub-surface."

Pedersen expressed frustration that a lack of
experts to integrate 4D seismic data with
production records, well loggings and
laboratory work on core samples was holding
back improvements in Statoil's management
of its reservoirs.

"We can't just sit and wait, we don't have
many years of life left on some of our fields,"
he said.

Statoil ordered a new survey this summer over
the large Statfjord field and contracted
Western Geophysical to compare results with
previous studies in 1980 and 1991.

Statoil hopes the survey will help increase
recovery from 65 to a mammoth 70 percent.

British Petroleum has begun a 4D project at
its Foinaven field off the west of Scotland
which will compare the merits of repeated
OBC and surface seismic surveys and help
improve oil recovery.

BP and Schlumberger seismic subsidiary
Geco-Prakla have buried a seismic cable a
metre under the ocean floor around a fifth of
the Foinaven field in a $8 million joint project
with Shell.

First repeat surveys will be done nine to 12
months after oil starts flowing, which is now
scheduled, after many delays, for the last
quarter of this year.

(c) Reuters Limited