Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric who wrote (75803)	3/31/2017 11:07:44 AM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Recommended By Brumar89 Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 86355

Eric, I don't depend on the Supreme Court or any other official body to do my thinking for me. You probably understand that the Supreme Court is not scientifically literate. If the Supreme Court declares something is true, that doesn't make it so. Do you really think this is a sensible argument? << You mistakenly think of CO2 as pollution The U.S. Supreme Court decided it is. The science community does... Tell you what, walk into a room of pure CO2. Let's see how long you live. O2 won't kill you in the same situation. >> Do you think the same way about vitamin A, or how about eating red meat, or salt? A room full of vitamin A would be toxic too. Eating a huge amount of red meat is problematic too. Did you know that salt and many nutrients have optimum levels of ingestion? Too much and they become toxic. CO2 is an absolutely essential ingredient of the atmosphere. Most people would be dead without it being present at least at 300 parts per million. 400 parts per million is even better. It's a macro nutrient for plants Eric. Read slowly, move lips, point finger. Try to absorb like plants absorb CO2 and make human food. CO2 is not a pollutant at 400 parts per million. Water emissions are not pollutants either even though if you walk into a room full of water you will drown but you can walk into a room full of air and not drown. Try walking into a room full of nitrogen and see how long you last. But nitrogen isn't a pollutant either. Mqurice

To: Eric who wrote (75803)	4/2/2017 12:27:27 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86355

anonymous lying asshole troll eRICO, walk in a room of pure nitrogen and you will be just as dead as a room full of pure CO2. The Supreme court ruled that the congress can pass a law giving any idiot the right to define what is and is not a polutant and then create rules about it. The Supreme court did not rule CO2 was a polutant idiot. now as to 100% O2.... what an idiot you are. Maybe your problem is you spent to much time in a pure oxygen environment. Imaging Study Reveals How Pure Oxygen Harms The Brain ... sciencedaily.com May 24, 2007 - Imaging Study Reveals How Pure Oxygen Harms The Brain ... deliver oxygen -- the opposite effect you want when you're trying to resuscitate ... UCLA Study Reveals Why Bad Things Happen Inside the Brain When ... newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/UCLA-Study-Reveals-Why-Bad-Things-7949 May 21, 2007 - For thefirst time, a new UCLA brain-imaging study reveals why. ... "When the children inhaled pure oxygen, their breathingquickened, resulting in ... the heart's ability to pumpblood and deliver oxygen — the opposite effect you ... Frontier: Pure Oxygen Can Harm the Brain - Dana Foundation www.dana.org/news/brainwork/detail.aspx?id=8364 Harper's team plans to study the long-term effects of pure oxygen and whether the brain response is different when a patient is sleeping. But for now, the ... Oxygen toxicity - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org Oxygen toxicity is a condition resulting from the harmful effects of breathing molecular oxygen ( ..... This is illustrated by modern pure oxygen use in spacesuits, which must operate at low .... Bitterman et al. in 1986 and 1995 showed that darkness and caffeine would delay the onset of changes to brain electrical activity in rats.