SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1009021)3/31/2017 11:16:16 AM
From: rdkflorida2  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1575981
 
Senate turns down Flynn's begging for immunity. Justice/FBI says we want to nail him?? Comrade Aga Flynn looks to be in deep sh*t. So much for Chump Trump's "extreme" vetting. LOL! More coming. It's great to have friends in law enforcement. Honestly, it is.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1009021)4/6/2017 10:50:27 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Respond to of 1575981
 
Lamar Smith and denier scientists were outwitted and outperformed by Michael Mann
Sou | 9:08 PM

I'll keep this short - and it's sweet :)

Anthony Watts' pet uber-conspiracy theorists both thought Michael Mann performed best at the recent committee hearing that Lamar Smith and his cronies orchestrated.

Tim Ball, who promotes the nuttiest climate conspiracy theories, wrote (emphasis mine):

My challenge to skeptics is to view the hearing as an uninformed citizen. From that perspective, I would argue that Mann was the most effective and persuasive. He was assertive, apparently provided hard evidence, had the backing of most scientists and scientific societies. He turned the minority status role the organizers gave him into the base for his victimization role. It wasn’t a debate, but he turned it into one and clearly believed, as would most uninformed observers, that he won.

Leo Goldstein (aka Ari Halperin), who is also as nutty as they come, (see here in particular) wrote (emphasis Leo's):
If it had been my first time hearing about this subject I would have concluded that the climate alarmists were right.
Good for you, Professor Mann.

blog.hotwhopper.com