Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (41587)	4/1/2017 6:40:38 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42652

I have no recollection of discussion of Medicare options other than what became law. I imagine, though, that it simply never occurred to them. It might have occurred to the R's had they been participating in crafting the legislation, which would have provoked some negotiation and possibly the result you suggest, but, left to their own devices, not something the D's would likely come up with. The cohort here is poor. D's are not likely to expect them to contribute at that income level. Also, D's are constitutionally indisposed to tiered benefits. They would be more likely to ask for a co-pay than a second class benefit. It would have been awkward, too, to give the new Medicaids poorer benefits than original Medicaids, and then charge them for participation, to boot. I don't see how one could argue to the public for that. I believe many have reached a point where they think the entitlement state needs to have at least an element of beneficiary contribution or effort. Which many? Not the Medicare for all folks. As for the law surviving, the D's were concerned about the viability of the marketplace part of Obamacare but what could threaten the survival of the Medicare extension? There's no inherent threat and a dismantling by the R's would require would require both a government takeover and reneging on a benefit to millions of voters, again not likely.